2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of non-zero loadings in sparse principal component analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this moment, little is known about which model selection method(s) are suitable for regularized simultaneous component analysis: Cross-validation is a popular choice, but it is known that cross-validation methods tend to retain more variables than needed (Chen & Chen, 2008). Other model selection methods, such as Index of Sparseness (Gajjar et al, 2017; Trendafilov, 2014; Zou et al, 2006), stability selection (Meinshausen & Bühlmann, 2010), and AIC, BIC type methods (e.g., Chen & Chen, 2008; Croux,Filzmoser, & Fritz, 2013; Guo, James, Levina, Michailidis, & Zhu, 2010), may be considered as alternative methods for model selection. Furthermore, regularized SCA needs to be further extended to incorporate categorical data, which are often seen in social and behavioral research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At this moment, little is known about which model selection method(s) are suitable for regularized simultaneous component analysis: Cross-validation is a popular choice, but it is known that cross-validation methods tend to retain more variables than needed (Chen & Chen, 2008). Other model selection methods, such as Index of Sparseness (Gajjar et al, 2017; Trendafilov, 2014; Zou et al, 2006), stability selection (Meinshausen & Bühlmann, 2010), and AIC, BIC type methods (e.g., Chen & Chen, 2008; Croux,Filzmoser, & Fritz, 2013; Guo, James, Levina, Michailidis, & Zhu, 2010), may be considered as alternative methods for model selection. Furthermore, regularized SCA needs to be further extended to incorporate categorical data, which are often seen in social and behavioral research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the usefulness of such comprehensive procedures is much needed and deserves full attention in a separate article. Recently, Gu and Van Deun (2018) studied a few model selection methods for regularized SCA and found that a relatively lesser known, computationally efficient method, namely the Index of Sparseness (Gajjar et al, 2017; Trendafilov, 2014; Zou et al, 2006), outperformed cross-validation in terms of selecting the proper component loading structure. Thus, a comprehensive, yet computationally feasible model selection procedure for deciding R , λ L , and λ G based on the Index of Sparseness may be promising, but in this article we refrain from discussing it, because the procedure requires development and validation via, for example, simulation studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let # o denote the total number of zero loadings in . Then IS, according to Gajjar, Kulahci, and Palazoglu 28 and Trendafilov 29 , is…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, to identify a suitable variable selection method for regularized SCA, we examined the performance of six methods, including CV with “one-standard-error” rule 26 , stability selection 25 , repeated double cross-validation (rdCV) 27 , Index of Sparseness (IS) 2830 , Bolasso with CV 31–33 , and a BIC criterion 34,35 . We chose CV with the “one-standard-error” rule, rdCV, IS, and Bolasso, because they had been used successfully in various applications of sparse PCA methods, including early recognition and disease prediction 36 , schizophrenia research 37 , epidemics 38 , cardiac research 39 , environmental research 40 , and psychometrics 41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 principal components are selected. In this study, the Index of Sparseness (IS) is adopted to determine the number of non-zero coefficients (NNZC) for each principal component [33]. Fig.…”
Section: An Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%