2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-09861-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of optimal aggregation function for the revised leachate pollution index (r-LPI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It enables us to understand if the variance in the output can be attributed to variation in the input, either qualitatively or quantitively. A thorough investigation into the selection of appropriate aggregation functions was carried out and reported elsewhere (Bisht et al 2022b). As a result, the weighted arithmetic aggregation function was found to exhibit comparatively less eclipsing than the weighted multiplicative and is also sensitive to variations in the sub-index values and was thus used in the analysis (Bisht et al 2022b).…”
Section: Aggregation Of Sub-indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enables us to understand if the variance in the output can be attributed to variation in the input, either qualitatively or quantitively. A thorough investigation into the selection of appropriate aggregation functions was carried out and reported elsewhere (Bisht et al 2022b). As a result, the weighted arithmetic aggregation function was found to exhibit comparatively less eclipsing than the weighted multiplicative and is also sensitive to variations in the sub-index values and was thus used in the analysis (Bisht et al 2022b).…”
Section: Aggregation Of Sub-indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a multidimensional entity, a series of survey questionnaires were carried out at different stages to reduce the ambiguity and compensate for subjectivity in the development of a composite indicator such as r‐LPI. Selection of parameters, relative ranking, normalization, and parameter aggregation are the four stages that entail the formulation of an index 31,32 . In this study, three FAHP methods were used to calculate the weights of the r‐LPI parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of parameters, relative ranking, normalization, and parameter aggregation are the four stages that entail the formulation of an index. 31,32 In this study, three FAHP methods were used to calculate the weights of the r-LPI parameters. The results of these methods were compared to identify the optimal method for the calculation of the weights of the r-LPI parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An in-depth experimental comparison of the first results obtained for this class of functions was presented, among others, in [36], [40]. In general, the problem of selection of optimal aggregation function has been also considered recently in [41]- [44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%