2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of optimal seismic intensity measures using fuzzy-probabilistic seismic demand analysis and fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chosen IM should effectively capture the ground motion damage potential, and correlation analyses between various IMs and response variables are employed to identify optimal IMs [47][48][49][50]. Riddell [27] proposed a comprehensive evaluation to assess the effectiveness of 23 IMs, as detailed in Liu et al [38].…”
Section: Selection Of Intensity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen IM should effectively capture the ground motion damage potential, and correlation analyses between various IMs and response variables are employed to identify optimal IMs [47][48][49][50]. Riddell [27] proposed a comprehensive evaluation to assess the effectiveness of 23 IMs, as detailed in Liu et al [38].…”
Section: Selection Of Intensity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several evaluation criteria have been proposed to determine the best IM for seismic risk assessment of various structures, including correlation, efciency, practicality, profciency, sufciency, relative sufciency, and hazard computability. To date, these criteria and extensive studies are mainly focused on buildings [22,23], bridges [24], dams [25], storage tanks [26], tunnels [27,28], ofshore platform [29,30], and nuclear power plant [31,32]. Due to the space constraints, an elaboration of the work about optimal IM for above-given structures is not shown herein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%