2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-010-1033-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of single-walled carbon nanotubes according to both their diameter and chirality via nanotweezers

Abstract: Diameter-and chirality-dependent interactions between aromatic molecule-based nanotweezers and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) are revealed by density functional theory calculations. We found that the threshold diameter of selected SWNTs is determined by the end-to-end distance of the nanotweezer. Large-diameter SWNTs are preferred by a nanotweezer with an obtuse folding angle, whereas small-diameter SWNTs are favored by a nanotweezer with an acute folding angle. The adsorption can be further stabilized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tubes with diameters smaller than 1.25 nm are substantially reduced in our samples, whereas tubes with diameters around 1.59 nm become the most prevalent. We hypothesize that this selectivity arises from the varying interactions between SWNTs with different diameters and the triptycene units with a fixed size and shape in 1 . Future improvements in this technique will focus on varying the size, shape, and electronic properties of the small molecule bound to the surface to tune the interactions with SWNTs and improve selectivity for different types of SWNTs.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubes with diameters smaller than 1.25 nm are substantially reduced in our samples, whereas tubes with diameters around 1.59 nm become the most prevalent. We hypothesize that this selectivity arises from the varying interactions between SWNTs with different diameters and the triptycene units with a fixed size and shape in 1 . Future improvements in this technique will focus on varying the size, shape, and electronic properties of the small molecule bound to the surface to tune the interactions with SWNTs and improve selectivity for different types of SWNTs.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly,c omputational studies on an analogous system of p-concave hosts was carriedo ut by Zhou et al [76] They compared as eries of armchair and zigzag SWNTsw ith diameters ranging from 6 to 20 and the binding affinity of these nanotubes with acene-based p-concave hosts rangingfrom anthracene to heptacene (Figure 23). It wasc alculated that the acene tweezers had an oticeablep reference for binding to zigzag SWNTsa sw ould be expected by their matching shape.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compound 1 should possess the aptitude to interact with SWNTs given that it contains two full triptycene cores. Opportunely, inspirational work from Lu, Gao, and co‐workers has demonstrated the possibility of a selective interaction between SWNTs and “nanotweezer” iptycenes, yielding the additional enticing prospect of diameter and chirality selectivity for our alignment relay technique.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubes with diameters smaller than 1.25 nm are substantially reduced in our samples, whereas tubes with diameters around 1.59 nm become the most prevalent. We hypothesize that this selectivity arises from the varying interactions between SWNTs with different diameters and the triptycene units with a fixed size and shape in 1 . Future improvements in this technique will focus on varying the size, shape, and electronic properties of the small molecule bound to the surface to tune the interactions with SWNTs and improve selectivity for different types of SWNTs.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%