Selection of student-selected component [SSCs] modules across the medical undergraduate curriculum: Relationship with motivational factors

Abstract

Student-selected components (SSCs) encourage the following within the undergraduate medical curriculum: greater exploration of core curriculum topics; exploration of non-core subjects/experiences; research and self-directed learning; and personal and professional development opportunities. This study examined the motivational factors which influence SSC choice to assess (a) SSC selection patterns across each year of the curriculum (direct and graduate entry) and (b) motivation underlying SSC selection across the curriculum. During SSC registration at University College Cork, all medical undergraduates (years 1-3, graduate-entry medicine) were required to select an SSC and provide a written justification for their selection. Five primary motivational factors were identified: correction of perceived deficits; genuine interest in subject and wish to study in more depth; career strategy; exam strategy; and taking a chance. A complex pattern of relationships emerged in relation to matching of motivational factors with SSC categories, e.g. selection of research skills SSCs was strongly associated with the 'career strategy' motivation. Significant differences were observed across curriculum years, as well as between direct-entry versus graduate-entry undergraduates, with respect to SSC selections and underlying motivation. This study provides insight into changing patterns of SSC selection in medicine, as well as accompanying motivational factors, across the undergraduate years.

Studying medicine – a cross-sectional questionnaire-based analysis of the motivational factors which influence graduate and undergraduate entrants in Ireland

“…For analysis of responses to open-ended questions, analysis was restricted to a thematic analysis and constant comparison of written comments provided by students, as described previously. 20 …”

An integrated model for developing research skills in an undergraduate medical curriculum: appraisal of an approach using student selected components

“…For students, there are a complex series of motivations that are involved in decision-making as to the choice of project [23, 38]. Self-selection of a medical speciality and project often reflects a possible career interest, so they are motivated, enthusiastic, and want to impress their faculty supervisor who may become a potential mentor, referee or colleague.…”

Investigating the impact of a research-based integrated curriculum on self-perceived research experiences of medical students in community placements: a pre- and post-test analysis of three student cohorts

“…Based on the studies undertaken by Vygotsky [11] in ‘meta-cognition’ and ‘self-regulated learning’, the UoW medical students are encouraged to create their own area of inquiry, affording them the opportunity to be exposed to ‘situated learning’ [12] and thus allowing them to further develop a deep learning and understanding [13] about research and critical appraisal. Furthermore, engagement in a research project of their own choice that deals with real world problems [14] helps to foster ‘authentic’ learning [15,16] and motivation [17] because students view the task as relevant and interesting. Then, as the research project builds upon and incorporates the RCA principles learnt in earlier phases of the program, the project becomes a conduit for ‘meaningful learning’ [18].…”