Selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral approach

Büyüközkan, Gülçin; Feyzıog̃lu, Orhan; Göçer, Fethullah

doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.005

Cited by 114 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 118 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most meaningful way to compare the ranking results of different MCDA methods is to compare evaluations with the same data set of criteria and alternatives. Papers which apply several MCDA methods on the same data set most often find relatively consistent rankings [23,29,30,35,38]. Similar to such analyses, Lanjewar et al [41] and Vahdani et al [50] apply different MCDA methods on data sets already used and ranked in previous publications.…”

Section: Comparison Of Results Of Similar Analysesmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Cai et al [35] apply ELECTRE additionally to WSM and TOPSIS. Büyüközkan et al [30] compare the results of a newly proposed Intuitionistic Fuzzy Choquet Integral to the ones obtained with a 2-additiive Choquet integral and TOPSIS.…”

Section: Summary Of Mcda Methods and Background Of Reviewed Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other authors use a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach to define their evaluation criteria [13,29,[35][36][37]40], while Hayashi et al [43] base their selection on the indicators in the Global Bioenergy Partnership. Perimenis et al [53] and Büyüközkan et al [30] rely solely on expert opinion to identify relevant criteria. Furthermore, Streimikiene et al [47] use the EU Transport Policy as background for their selection and Papalexandrou et al [59] base their evaluation on a well-to-wheel analysis, which also defines the criteria and alternatives in their study.…”

Section: Rationale For Selection Of Alternatives and Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Road Transportation Fuels and Vehicles: A Systematic Review and Classification of the Literature

Kügemann

Polatidis

2019

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods help decision makers to consider and weigh diverse criteria that include economic, environmental, social and technological aspects. This characteristic makes them a popular tool to comparatively evaluate road transportation fuels and vehicles (RTFV). The aim of this paper is to systematically classify and analyse the literature applying MCDA methods on the evaluation of RTFV. To this end, 40 relevant papers are pinpointed and discussed. We identified a great number of evaluation criteria employed in the reviewed papers from which we have established a concluding list of 41 criteria, that can serve as a pool for future research. A further analysis of the evaluation criteria reveals that the process of criteria selection partly suffers from a lack of scientific foundation and standardization. We propose to standardize the criteria selection process by using the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) methodology as a guiding reference. In addition, we compared the MCDA results obtained from studies with relatively similar setups and found that the evaluation results are also generally similar and seem not to be influenced by the particular MCDA method employed. Based on the results of the reviewed papers, one may say that electricity and ethanol appear to be good alternatives for light vehicles, whereas gaseous fuels seem more appropriate for heavy vehicles like buses. Striking deviations from these generally observed results are often caused by specific evaluation contexts, particular criteria taken into account and unusual weight sets applied.The last category (c) is concerned with hydrogen in particular, as is a potential energy carrier in the aforementioned fuel cell vehicles. Three specific hydrogen production paths are evaluated, i.e., electrolysis, steam reforming and gasification, sourced from different feedstock [11][12][13][14][15]. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis MethodsThis Section shortly outlines the MCDA methods most often used in the reviewed papers. MCDA methods can be broadly divided in Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) with limited solutions for a finite set of alternatives and Multi-Objective Decision Making (MODM) with indefinite solutions for an indefinite set of possible scenarios [16]. MODM methods usually comprise some form of optimization, for instance linear or nonlinear programming. These methods start with certain restrictions which determine the optimal solution [17] and find a solution by optimizing the resulting

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Results Of Similar Analysesmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Summary Of Mcda Methods and Background Of Reviewed Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Rationale For Selection Of Alternatives and Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Road Transportation Fuels and Vehicles: A Systematic Review and Classification of the Literature

Kügemann

Polatidis

2019

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ferrira et al [69] constructed an evaluation framework for improving the decision-making virtuous cycle of ethical banking practices by applying the Choquet integral. Furthermore, the Choquet integral also has been applied to many areas, such as pattern recognition [33][34][35], selection of alternatives [36][37][38][39], and risk assessment [40,41].…”

Section: Application Of Choquet Integralmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green Supplier Selection Based on Consensus Process and Integrating Prioritized Operator and Choquet Integral

Zhu

2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green supplier selection, as a core part of green supply chain management, has attracted the attention of various researchers in the past decade. Plenty of green supplier selection methods based on multi-criteria group decision-making have been presented in previous literature. However, these approaches ignore the consensus level between the experts, and they rarely consider the priority level among the experts and the interdependent relationship between criteria. To handle these issues, an integrated framework of green supplier selection under the hesitant fuzzy linguistic (HFL) environment was established. In this framework, the preference information expressed by HFL was transformed into the hesitant 2-tuple linguistic (H2TL). Then, the consensus process was introduced into the green supplier selection process to increase the consensus level between experts. The H2TL prioritized operator and Choquet integral operator were respectively applied to construct the group decision matrix and derive the ranking order of green suppliers. Finally, we used a numerical example to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the presented framework and implemented a comparative analysis to highlight the features of the presented method.

show abstract

“…[2][3][4][5][6] For example, based on the research on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), 7 Wu et al 8 introduced the integration properties of the intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral and its adaption in the multicriteria decision making. Büyüközkan et al 9 utilized the Choquet integral for selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives. With respect to Pythagorean fuzzy environment, 10 Peng et al 11 proposed a Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet integral average operator and discussed its application in multiattribute group decision making.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

q ‐Rung orthopair fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation and its application in heterogeneous multicriteria two‐sided matching decision making

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the real decision making, q‐rung orthopair fuzzy sets ( q‐ROFSs) as a novel effective tool can depict and handle uncertain information in a broader perspective. Considering the interrelationships among the criteria, this paper extends Choquet integral to the q‐rung orthopair fuzzy environment and further investigates its application in multicriteria two‐sided matching decision making. To determine the fuzzy measures used in Choquet integral, we first define a pair of q‐rung orthopair fuzzy entropy and cross‐entropy. Then, by utilizing λ‐fuzzy measure theory, we propose an entropy‐based method to calculate the fuzzy measures upon criteria. Furthermore, we discuss q‐rung orthopair fuzzy Choquet integral operator and its properties. Thus, with the aid of q‐rung orthopair fuzzy Choquet integral, we consider the preference heterogeneity of the matching subjects and further explore the corresponding generalized model and approach for the two‐sided matching. Finally, a simulated example of loan market matching is given to illustrate the validity and applicability of our proposed approach.

show abstract

Selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral approach

Cited by 114 publications

References 118 publications

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Road Transportation Fuels and Vehicles: A Systematic Review and Classification of the Literature

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Road Transportation Fuels and Vehicles: A Systematic Review and Classification of the Literature

Green Supplier Selection Based on Consensus Process and Integrating Prioritized Operator and Choquet Integral

q ‐Rung orthopair fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation and its application in heterogeneous multicriteria two‐sided matching decision making

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About