1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0171-2985(84)80114-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of the Delayed Hypersensitivity T Effector and T Suppressor Cell Response by Antigen-Presenting Macrophages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MIF-stimulated macrophages are functionally more active with regard to cell metabolism, adherence, ruffled membrane motility, and spreading. Macrophages expressing the MIF receptor have been shown to function as accessory cells in the induction of T helper cells 114. Czarnetzki et al show increased expression of MIF on ECs in CU skin sections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIF-stimulated macrophages are functionally more active with regard to cell metabolism, adherence, ruffled membrane motility, and spreading. Macrophages expressing the MIF receptor have been shown to function as accessory cells in the induction of T helper cells 114. Czarnetzki et al show increased expression of MIF on ECs in CU skin sections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrophages exhibit an array of functions, from phagocytosis and antigen presentation to the production of various cytokines, including interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor α, among others [ 41 , 42 ]. Stress enhances the infiltration, activation, and antigen-presenting capability of macrophages [ 15 , 43 ] suggesting that macrophages have a capacity to react against acute stress as demonstrated in this experiment. Although CXCR2 is expressed on macrophage progenitor cells under tumor conditions [ 44 ], to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that CXCR2 is expressed on macrophages under non-tumor conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Antigenspecific suppressive actions of custocytes have less often been reported [121][122][123]. T 'suppressor' cell induction has been shown to be preferentially induced by certain bone marrow-derived custocyte populations in contact hypersensitivity [124][125][126][127]. In this model, T suppressor cell induction was inhibited by IFN-, ; the custocyte-associated mechanisms leading to T suppressor cell development as well as suppressor custocyte and T suppressor cell differentiation were at that time not fully elucidated [128].…”
Section: 'No Inflammation Without Custocytes'mentioning
confidence: 99%