1960
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(60)90141-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of treatment for corpus cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,20,21 In most of them, tumor size was evaluated according to gross inspection of hysterectomy specimens. Schink et al 6 reported that average tumor diameter greater than 2 cm in pathologic specimen independently predicted lymph node metastasis and survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,20,21 In most of them, tumor size was evaluated according to gross inspection of hysterectomy specimens. Schink et al 6 reported that average tumor diameter greater than 2 cm in pathologic specimen independently predicted lymph node metastasis and survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Tumor size has been reported to have a prognostic impact in endometrial cancer since 1960s. 5 Although International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer does not include tumor size measurement, relationship of large macroscopic tumor size in hysterectomy specimen and poor survival has long been known. 6,7 Some recent publications including large cohorts from Japan and Korea focused on prognostic value of tumor volume index (product of maximum three diameters) based on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in predicting lymph node metastasis and the endometrial cancer prognosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tumor size was reported to be an indicator of prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer as early as 1960 by Gusberg et al (42), who demonstrated a worse prognosis when the uterus measured more than 10 cm. This fairly imprecise estimate was redefined by Schink et al (26), who evaluated tumor size as the average tumor diameter measured in the pathologic specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Tumor size (TS) has been suggested to be an indicator of prognosis in endometrial cancer as early as 1960, when it was found that a uterus sounding greater than 10 cm was associated with worse prognosis. 5 This fairly imprecise estimate was redefined, and TS was independently associated with risk of lymph node metastasis (4% for tumors G2 cm or 15% for tumors 92 cm) and was a significant prognostic factor for survival (98% vs 84%). 6 Other researchers have shown TS greater than 2 cm to be associated with extrauterine disease, nodal metastasis, and recurrence, but only in univariate analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%