2004
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection on body size in a raptor with pronounced reversed sexual size dimorphism: are bigger females better?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such complexity underlines the diYculty of capturing individual quality by means of a single univariate measure. This diYculty was further emphasised by the fact that morphometric measures of individual quality, such as size and mass residuals, had opposite eVects on the productivity of males and females, which may be common in raptorial species (Massemin et al 2000;McDonald et al 2005;Sergio et al 2007b and references therein). This highlights the importance of an in-depth understanding of the general ecology of the study species before devising biologically meaningful estimates of individual quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such complexity underlines the diYculty of capturing individual quality by means of a single univariate measure. This diYculty was further emphasised by the fact that morphometric measures of individual quality, such as size and mass residuals, had opposite eVects on the productivity of males and females, which may be common in raptorial species (Massemin et al 2000;McDonald et al 2005;Sergio et al 2007b and references therein). This highlights the importance of an in-depth understanding of the general ecology of the study species before devising biologically meaningful estimates of individual quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, smaller males may be more productive but survive less well (e.g. McDonald et al 2005). Such antagonistic selective pressures may outweigh the eVect of individual quality over the long term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of authors studying a range of animal types and performance traits have proposed that large body sizes per se increase fitness in animals, and summarized their results under the general premise of ''bigger is better'' (e.g., Lighton et al, 1994;Gabor, 1995;Ferguson, 2000;Schlupp et al, 2001;Steer et al, 2003;McDonald et al, 2005;Meekan et al, 2006;Kingsolver & Huey, 2008;MacNulty et al, 2009). However, this evidence is just a growing body of evidence that questions it using the even more trendy term ''bigger isn't always better'' (Knapp & Warner, 1991;Litvak & Leggett, 1992;Meyer, 1992;Sadowski et al, 1999;Topping & Millar, 1999;Gaillard et al, 2000;Pureswaran & Borden, 2003;Dibattista et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%