1994
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300032729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection on reaction norms, genetic correlations and constraints

Abstract: Two approaches to the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in heterogeneous environments have recently been put forward. The first focuses on selection on the character expression within each environment; plasticity is seen as a by-product of local selection in various habitats. The second approach focuses on selection on the parameters of the response function of genotypes, and selection is thought to change the frequencies of 'plasticity' genes that affect the function. This paper discusses the relationship be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the scatter of reaction norms for height, branching and especially leaf number, was such that the corresponding genetic correlations were very low. Should selection favour increased or decreased plasticity for any of these traits, we would expect a quick response by a population constituted of the families examined here (de Jong, 1995;van Tienderen & Koelewijn, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the scatter of reaction norms for height, branching and especially leaf number, was such that the corresponding genetic correlations were very low. Should selection favour increased or decreased plasticity for any of these traits, we would expect a quick response by a population constituted of the families examined here (de Jong, 1995;van Tienderen & Koelewijn, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differ-ent phenotypes consistent with a given genotype are thus considered to be programmed subroutines that have evolved as a result of distinct sets of selective pressures acting at different life-history stages (Stearns, 2000) or the outcomes of evolution for "evolvability" (Gerhart and Kirschner, 1997). While the concept of environment-dependent reaction norms has both adaptive and nonadaptive aspects (Schlichting and Pigliucci, 1998), discussion of plasticity in this framework has centered on selection and genetic mechanisms (Van Tienderen andKoelewijn, 1994, Pigliucci, 1996). Our view is that rather than being the result of evolutionary adaptation, much morphological plasticity reflects the influence of external physico-chemical parameters on any material system and is therefore an inherent, inevitable property of organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypic plasticity, the capacity of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes in different environments, receives increasing attention among evolutionary biologists (Via, 1992(Via, , 1993(Via, , 1994Scheiner, 1993a, b;Pigliucci, 1993, 1998;Van Tienderen and Koelewijn, 1994;Gotthard and Nylin, 1995;Via et al, 1995;Pigliucci, 1998Pigliucci, , 2001De Jong and Gavrilets, 2000;De Witt and Scheiner, 2003). Plasticity may be considered as a specific trait, and the evolution of plasticity is now a hotly debated subject among evolutionary biologists (Via et al, 1995;Callahan et al, 1997;Agrawal, 2001;van Dooren, 2001;Scheiner, 2002;David et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%