2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection, training and validation process of a sensory panel for bread analysis: Influence of cultivar on the quality of breads made from common wheat and spelt wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite using this simple method, we observed a large differentiation in flavor of the different breads, leading to a significant s 2 G (Table 1). These findings underline results from other studies that also report significant differences in flavor between their few investigated varieties (Callejo et al, 2015;Starr et al, 2015).…”
Section: Good Differentiation Among Varieties Regarding Flavor and Odsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Despite using this simple method, we observed a large differentiation in flavor of the different breads, leading to a significant s 2 G (Table 1). These findings underline results from other studies that also report significant differences in flavor between their few investigated varieties (Callejo et al, 2015;Starr et al, 2015).…”
Section: Good Differentiation Among Varieties Regarding Flavor and Odsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results of sensory cohesiveness of bread samples are shown in Table , with grades ranging from 4.50 to 6.96, similar (2.8–8.2) to those found in the study of Callejo et al . () where breads were baked with bread wheat and spelt wheat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative study with spelt varieties showed acceptable sensory scores with significant differences among the varieties (Korczyk Szabó and Lacko Bartošová ), leading to conclude that spelt might be a suitable raw material for bread making, but it remains closely related to the choice of spelt variety (Korczyk Szabó and Lacko Bartošová ). Compared to common bread, spelt genotypes had high crumb elasticity, but low crumb cell homogeneity, which are probably due to its special dough rheological attributes (Callejo and others ). Nutritionally, these breads had less total starch, more resistant starch, and less rapidly digested proteins in comparison to bread made with modern wheat flours (Bonafaccia and others ).…”
Section: Ancient Grains‐based Foodstuffs: Nutritional Added Value Andmentioning
confidence: 99%