2005
DOI: 10.1186/1744-8069-1-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Activation of Primary Afferent Fibers Evaluated by Sine-Wave Electrical Stimulation

Abstract: Transcutaneous sine-wave stimuli at frequencies of 2000, 250 and 5 Hz (Neurometer) are thought to selectively activate Aβ, Aδ and C afferent fibers, respectively. However, there are few reports to test the selectivity of these stimuli at the cellular level. In the present study, we analyzed action potentials (APs) generated by sine-wave stimuli applied to the dorsal root in acutely isolated rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) preparations using intracellular recordings. We also measured excitatory synaptic response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
144
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When we recorded from single fibers ( figure 4C), the CV of the uninjured segment was well within this range for Aβ fibers (Feasby et al, 1981,Shin et al, 1997. The regenerated axon segments did not conduct slower than 2m/sec, the upper CV of C-fibers (Leem et al 1993) and these axon segments were able to follow reliably at stimulation frequencies of up to 10 Hz, a frequency at which C-fibers show conduction changes (Koga et al 2005). Since we stimulated regenerated fibers at spinal level T9, it is also unlikely that the fibers were displaced Ia afferents that normally terminate in Clarke's column.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…When we recorded from single fibers ( figure 4C), the CV of the uninjured segment was well within this range for Aβ fibers (Feasby et al, 1981,Shin et al, 1997. The regenerated axon segments did not conduct slower than 2m/sec, the upper CV of C-fibers (Leem et al 1993) and these axon segments were able to follow reliably at stimulation frequencies of up to 10 Hz, a frequency at which C-fibers show conduction changes (Koga et al 2005). Since we stimulated regenerated fibers at spinal level T9, it is also unlikely that the fibers were displaced Ia afferents that normally terminate in Clarke's column.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Using the EPW test to evaluate C-, A␦-, and A␤-fiber functions after nerve injury (Koga et al, 2005;Matsumoto et al, 2008;Ueda, 2008), we found that AS-ODN significantly blocks hypoesthesia, seen in response to 5 Hz (Cfiber) stimuli, but does not block hypersensitization, seen in response to 250 Hz (A␦-fiber) or 2000 Hz (A␤-fiber) stimuli (Fig. 5A-C).…”
Section: Recovery Of C-fiber Function By Nrsf Knockdownmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Neurometer® electrodiagnostic stimulator (Neurotron, Inc, Baltimore, MD), through the application of a constant current neuroselective electrical stimulus, provides reliable measures of spinal sensory and peripheral sensory nerve function for both large and small myelinate, as well unmyelinated nerve fibers [6][7][8][9] . The Neurometer® delivers sine-wave stimuli at frequencies of 2000, 250, and 5 Hz that have been shown to selectively stimulate large myelinated (Aβ), small myelinated (Aδ), and small unmyelinated (C) fibers, respectively 10,11 . This easy to conduct electro diagnostic procedure has been used in the evaluation of bladder sensory function in humans 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%