2001
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective analysis of phosphopeptides within a protein mixture by chemical modification, reversible biotinylation and mass spectrometry

Abstract: A new method combining chemical modification and affinity purification is described for the characterization of serine and threonine phosphopeptides in proteins. The method is based on the conversion of phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues to S-(2-mercaptoethyl)cysteinyl or beta-methyl-S-(2-mercaptoethyl)cysteinyl residues by beta-elimination/1,2-ethanedithiol addition, followed by reversible biotinylation of the modified proteins. After trypsin digestion, the biotinylated peptides were affinity-isolate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mapping of phosphorylation sites within complex protein mixtures, however, is still a difficult task because of the often low stoichiometry of phosphorylation and signal suppression by unphosphorylated peptides. Specific capture of phosphopeptides is possible by ␤-elimination of the phosphate group and subsequent introduction of an affinity tag (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), or by covalent capture and release (24). These two methods have been designed for enhanced specificity but involve complex chemistry and have not been widely used because of limited sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping of phosphorylation sites within complex protein mixtures, however, is still a difficult task because of the often low stoichiometry of phosphorylation and signal suppression by unphosphorylated peptides. Specific capture of phosphopeptides is possible by ␤-elimination of the phosphate group and subsequent introduction of an affinity tag (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), or by covalent capture and release (24). These two methods have been designed for enhanced specificity but involve complex chemistry and have not been widely used because of limited sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting modified peptide can then be cleaved phosphospecifically by LysC endoprotease. Other chemical derivatization approaches have been developed based on the incorporation of biotin or fluorous affinity tags to aid the enrichment of phosphopeptides [22][23][24]. Although each of these methods has its own advantages and certain limitations, the development of new approaches for unambiguous, specific, and selective analysis of phosphoproteins to reduce suppression effects and enhance the detectability of phosphopeptides is still ongoing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify the identification of phosphoserine residues by CAD, we converted the phosphoserine residues to S-ethylcysteine by ␤-elimination in the presence of ethanethiol. This reaction specifically replaces phosphoryl group on serine or threonine with ethanethionyl giving a 44.008-Da mass shift from normal serine or threonine (17,23,24,33). Unlike phosphoryl groups, ethanethionyl groups were more resistant to fragmentation by CAD so that fragmentation of the peptide mainly takes place at the peptide backbone (17,23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%