2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2017.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective binding, magnetic separation and purification of histidine-tagged protein using biopolymer magnetic core-shell nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion of HMW proteins with the Ni 2+ -IDA-CSS-NP is more evident compared to other reports of IMAC-based coreshell sorbents. 10,40 In our work, HMW proteins were not observed, even with a more sensitive staining protocol (silver staining), whereas in other studies 10,40 HMW proteins were abundant, as they were observed using a less sensitive staining protocol such as Coomassie staining. 41 Adsorption capacity of Ni 2+ -IDA-CSS-NP was determined by estimating the amount of protein in the elutions by Bradford assay 21 from three different purications, and resulted in 4.16 AE 0.45 mg mg À1 of sorbent and this capacity was higher than that reported by Li and colleagues in 2016, 42 where they used modied Ni 2+ -IDA magnetic silica nanoparticles and presented a capacity of 3.6 mg mg À1 of sorbent.…”
Section: His-spo0f Recombinant Protein Purication By the Ni 2+ -Idacontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Exclusion of HMW proteins with the Ni 2+ -IDA-CSS-NP is more evident compared to other reports of IMAC-based coreshell sorbents. 10,40 In our work, HMW proteins were not observed, even with a more sensitive staining protocol (silver staining), whereas in other studies 10,40 HMW proteins were abundant, as they were observed using a less sensitive staining protocol such as Coomassie staining. 41 Adsorption capacity of Ni 2+ -IDA-CSS-NP was determined by estimating the amount of protein in the elutions by Bradford assay 21 from three different purications, and resulted in 4.16 AE 0.45 mg mg À1 of sorbent and this capacity was higher than that reported by Li and colleagues in 2016, 42 where they used modied Ni 2+ -IDA magnetic silica nanoparticles and presented a capacity of 3.6 mg mg À1 of sorbent.…”
Section: His-spo0f Recombinant Protein Purication By the Ni 2+ -Idacontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…It was first discovered that a couple of nanoparticles almost like the following metals, MNP, ZnO, TiO 2 , CuO, and Ag 2 O is having a tendency to precipitate the proteins and confirmed DNA with great quality [4,24]. Magnetic nanoparticles offer an elevating multitude of a common approach for the purification of biomolecules, and DNA isolation from bacteria and fungi respectively [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to overcome this hurdle is to use a combined series of extraction/purification procedures, which does, however, conflict with the aim of realizing a simple, rapid on-site and low-cost sample-processing device for biomarker monitoring. As for magnetic separation, Figure 18 shows a time-efficient and relatively simplistic way to concentrate specific protein analytes from a complex matrix [142]. This technique can be applied to the purification of proteins, cells, or other biomolecules [143].…”
Section: How To Detect On-sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplified example of magnetic protein separation using functionalized-magnetic beads in a single tube. (Re-printed from Zhou et al[142]. Copyright (2018), with permission from Elsevier).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%