2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00609-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
226
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
226
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the currently used implants observed problem is the lack of precise adherence to tissue surfaces, which could be solved by introducing free zones eg. carbon nanofibers or nanotubes [3]. These are particularly preferred material because of their lack of interaction with human tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the currently used implants observed problem is the lack of precise adherence to tissue surfaces, which could be solved by introducing free zones eg. carbon nanofibers or nanotubes [3]. These are particularly preferred material because of their lack of interaction with human tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No other material can compete with their outstanding combination of mechanical, thermal and electronic properties, which makes them an outstanding reinforcement material for composites (Goller et al, 2003;Cholpek et al, 2006;Price et al, 2003;Peigney, 2003). The ideal reinforcement material would impart mechanical integrity to the composite at high loadings, without diminishing its bioactivity.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotube-reinforced Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Nanocomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work has also shown increased osteoblast alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition when carbon fi bers and nanotubes were used as substrates for cell growth and increased osteoblast adhesion when a polyurethane/CNT composite was used as a substrate [20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%