Selective Criteria May Increase Lumbosacral Spine Roentgenogram Use in Acute Low-Back Pain

Frazier, Linda M.; Carey, Timothy S.; Lyles, Mary F.; Khayrallah, M.; McGaghie, William C.

doi:10.1001/archinte.1989.00390010065005

Cited by 25 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…78 A Cochrane review 34 was the key source paper used to formulate the international consensus questionnaire for the spinal malignancy section (APPENDIX B). Epidemiology Estimates for the point prevalence of spinal malignancy as a cause of LBP range between 0.0% and 0.7% in the primary care setting, 15,16,19,26,35,43 0.1% in the emergency care setting, 68 and 1.6% in the tertiary care setting. 66 Malignancy as a cause of musculoskeletal pain is estimated at 7.0% in the secondary care setting.…”

Section: Spinal Malignancymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Framework for Red Flags for Potential Serious Spinal Pathologies

Finucane

Downie

Mercer³

et al. 2020

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

173

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

about their care, even when faced with a serious diagnosis. Shared decision making is essential to ensure that individuals are supported to make decisions that are right for them. Using a collaborative process, the clinician should highlight the treatment options, evidence, risks, and benefits and, together with the person, seek to understand how these fit with that person's circumstances, goals, values, and beliefs. 56

show abstract

Section: Spinal Malignancymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Framework for Red Flags for Potential Serious Spinal Pathologies

Finucane

Downie

Mercer³

et al. 2020

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

173

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…9,10,[35][36][37][38] This rate is also high compared with the radiography use rates found among primary care physicians for acute LBP 9,10,39-41 and the rate expected when using evidence-based guidelines. [39][40][41] Although the rate of use is lower, there are also concerns about inappropriate and excessive use of radiography for LBP among primary care physicians. 10,[41][42][43][44] The focus group session provided some insight into the reasons for the high rate of radiography use (Fig 2).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing Evidence-Based Guidelines for Radiography in Acute Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study in a Chiropractic Community

Ammendolia

Hogg‐Johnson

Bombardier

et al. 2004

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Two systematic reviews [42,45], including six primary studies [88,90,91,[93][94][95] provided data on the diagnostic value of demographics for the diagnosis of spinal malignancy (see Table S14). The most reported index test was "Age greater than 50 years", being investigated by five primary studies.…”

Section: Malignancymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most reported index test was "Age greater than 50 years", being investigated by five primary studies. Within the four primary care studies [88,90,93,94], the specificity of this index test ranged from 0.66 95% CI (0.63, 0.69) to 0.74 95% CI (0.70, 0.78), and the post-test probability for spinal malignancy following a positive screening test result was 0.8%.…”

Section: Malignancymentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnosis Value of Patient Evaluation Components Applicable in Primary Care Settings for the Diagnosis of Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

Mathieu

Pasquier

Descarreaux

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low back pain ranks as the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Although best practice guidelines share a consistent diagnostic approach for the evaluation of patients with low back pain, confusion remains as to what extent patient history and physical examination findings can inform management strategies. The aim of this study was to summarize evidence investigating the diagnostic value of patient evaluation components applicable in primary care settings for the diagnosis of low back pain. To this end, peer-reviewed systematic reviews were searched in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases from 1 January 2000 to 10 April 2023. Paired reviewers independently reviewed all citations and articles using a two-phase screening process and independently extracted the data. Of the 2077 articles identified, 27 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis, radicular syndrome, non- specific low back pain and specific low back pain. Most patient evaluation components lack diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of low back pain when considered in isolation. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based and standardized evaluation procedures, especially for primary care settings where evidence is still scarce.

show abstract

Selective Criteria May Increase Lumbosacral Spine Roentgenogram Use in Acute Low-Back Pain

Cited by 25 publications

References 14 publications

International Framework for Red Flags for Potential Serious Spinal Pathologies

International Framework for Red Flags for Potential Serious Spinal Pathologies

Implementing Evidence-Based Guidelines for Radiography in Acute Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study in a Chiropractic Community

Diagnosis Value of Patient Evaluation Components Applicable in Primary Care Settings for the Diagnosis of Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About