1994
DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930550112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective digital enhancement of conventional film mammography

Abstract: Screening mammography continues to play a key role in the early diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer. Approximately 5% of patients will have lesions on their mammograms that appear neither clearly benign nor malignant. The proper management of these patients is not well defined. In this study, the mammograms of 64 women who underwent breast biopsy were reviewed. After the initial review, the mammograms were reevaluated using a personal computer driven digital conversion and enhancement system. The majority … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the 4-year period of our study in the Soroka Medical Center nearly 9500 screening mammographies and 438 wire localization biopsies of the mammographic findings were performed. This incidence of 4.6% is comparable to that reported in other studies [10,12]. Solid masses represented the most common indication for biopsy (n ϭ 182, 41.6%), following by C in 144 cases (32.9%), and A in 78 patients (17.8%); MC and S were less common findings: 25 (5.7%) and 9 (2.1%), respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…During the 4-year period of our study in the Soroka Medical Center nearly 9500 screening mammographies and 438 wire localization biopsies of the mammographic findings were performed. This incidence of 4.6% is comparable to that reported in other studies [10,12]. Solid masses represented the most common indication for biopsy (n ϭ 182, 41.6%), following by C in 144 cases (32.9%), and A in 78 patients (17.8%); MC and S were less common findings: 25 (5.7%) and 9 (2.1%), respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…8 Hale et al have applied nonspecific contrast and brightness adjustment through Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc, Mountain View, CA) to digitized mammograms and have found improved performance by radiologists in determining the likelihood of malignancy of mammographically apparent lesions. 9 Yin et al showed that nonlinear bilateral subtraction is useful in the computerdetection of mammographic masses. ~0., Previous work at the University of North Carolina has explored the use of intensity windowing (IW) and the Adaptive Histogram Equalization (AHE) family of algorithms in mammography and computed tomography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] We have previously described a laboratory-based method for testing the efficacy of an image processing algorithm in improving the detection of masses in dense mammographic backgrounds. 15 With that method, upon which our current work is based, radiologists and non-radiologists exhibit similar trends in detection performance.…”
Section: Copyright® 1997bywb Saunders Companymentioning
confidence: 99%