2009
DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective echocardiographic analysis of epicardial and endocardial left ventricular rotational mechanics in an animal model of pericardial adhesions

Abstract: The model suggests that early-stage pericardial adhesions reduce both epicardial and endocardial LV twist and torsion without a significant alteration in their transmural gradient. Selective endocardial/epicardial analysis of LV twisting mechanics may have a diagnostic role in detection of early formation of pericardial adhesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in a previous experimental model of pericardial adhesion, we demonstrated that myocardial motion is reduced because of pericardial adhesions over the epicardial surface; however, the epi-to-endocardial gradient of myocardial function remained unaltered, suggesting that endocardial shortening proceeds relatively normally despite the process of epicardial adhesions. 42 Our results suggest that the pericardial-myocardial functional relationships are more complex, and that a constrictive pericardium may alter myocardial function differentially in the myocardial layers. Perhaps with improved spatial resolution, in the near future, investigations could be undertaken to resolve the transmural gradient of strains in patients with CP and RCM.…”
Section: Myocardial Deformation In Cp and Rcmmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Indeed, in a previous experimental model of pericardial adhesion, we demonstrated that myocardial motion is reduced because of pericardial adhesions over the epicardial surface; however, the epi-to-endocardial gradient of myocardial function remained unaltered, suggesting that endocardial shortening proceeds relatively normally despite the process of epicardial adhesions. 42 Our results suggest that the pericardial-myocardial functional relationships are more complex, and that a constrictive pericardium may alter myocardial function differentially in the myocardial layers. Perhaps with improved spatial resolution, in the near future, investigations could be undertaken to resolve the transmural gradient of strains in patients with CP and RCM.…”
Section: Myocardial Deformation In Cp and Rcmmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…LV twist is defined as the maximal instantaneous difference between the apical and basal rotations. LV torsion is defined for the purpose of this study as LV twist magnitude normalized to LV length 4)14)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LV rotation plays an important role in maintaining efficient myocardial contraction during systole and aids in generating early suction power during the isovolumic relaxation period 2)3). Assessment of rotation may provide important insights into different types of myocardial dysfunction and the effect of different treatment strategies 4-9). Recent technological advances in echocardiography such as velocity vector imaging allows for the quantification of myocardial mechanics including rotation, twist and torsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the earlier studies, pericardium has been suggested to have a possible role in the interventricular interaction,3 although pericardial opening does not significantly affect the LV systolic and diastolic function in clinical situation 4 5. Other researchers suggested that a well-lubricated pericardium is important for normal twist,18 but they did not provide the data about the change of LV twist without pericardium. However, a recent study by Tanaka et al using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography showed that pericardial defects observed in patients with congenital total absence of pericardium leads to a lack of LV twist compared with normal controls 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%