2015
DOI: 10.5253/arde.v103i1.a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Forces Responsible for Transition to Nesting on Electricity Poles in the White StorkCiconia ciconia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many aspects of nest-supporting structures and location are important and may influence the breeding success of solitary nesting birds: nesting shrub species (Tryjanowski et al 2000), tree species, height, and diameter (Zawadzki and Zawadzka 2017). For some bird species, the type of nest supporting structure explains not only breeding effect but also reoccupation rate (Tryjanowski et al 2009;Tobolka et al 2013;Janiszewski et al 2015). Anthropogenic changes in the environment generally have a negative influence on the availability of natural nesting sites (Yasué and Dearden 2006); however, for some bird species, changes in the environment lead to the provision of new sites (Mainwaring 2015).…”
Section: The Structure Supporting the Nestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many aspects of nest-supporting structures and location are important and may influence the breeding success of solitary nesting birds: nesting shrub species (Tryjanowski et al 2000), tree species, height, and diameter (Zawadzki and Zawadzka 2017). For some bird species, the type of nest supporting structure explains not only breeding effect but also reoccupation rate (Tryjanowski et al 2009;Tobolka et al 2013;Janiszewski et al 2015). Anthropogenic changes in the environment generally have a negative influence on the availability of natural nesting sites (Yasué and Dearden 2006); however, for some bird species, changes in the environment lead to the provision of new sites (Mainwaring 2015).…”
Section: The Structure Supporting the Nestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher densities were expected to promote the likelihood of pylons being used for nesting, because either more individuals would be looking for a nest site, or stronger competition for the best sites would force some individuals to use pylons. Other authors have also described a higher probability of using electricity pylons as density increased (Janiszewski et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Examples of the use of electricity pylons by species with conservation value include the endangered Cape vulture Gyps coprotheres (Anderson & Hohne, 2007), Egyptian vulture Neophron percnopterus (Arkumarev, Dobrev, Abebe, Popgeorgiev, & Nikolov, 2014) and Saker falcon Falco cherrug (Dixon, Purev-Ochir, Galtbalt, & Batbayar, 2013). This study focused on the white stork as a case study, because this charismatic bird is increasingly using power-line pylons as nesting structure in many European countries (Janiszewski, Minias, & Wojciechowski, 2015;Muzinic & Cvitan, 2001;Tucakov, 2006), most noticeably in the Iberian Peninsula (Infante & Peris, 2003;Janss & Sanchez, 1997). In the case of Portugal, the white stork breeding population increased sixfold from 1984 to 2014, and during this period the proportion of storks nesting on electricity pylons increased from c. 2% to 25% of the national breeding population, the vast majority on pylons of the transmission (150-400 kV) grid which are large structures capable of holding several nests of this species (Moreira et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research found conflicting results, with evidence of either no impact (e.g. Tryjanowski et al 2009) or a negative impact on productivity (Janiszewski et al 2015) as a consequence of nesting on electricity pylons. Future studies should further clarify this aspect, including evaluating the potential impacts of electromagnetic fields on nesting storks (Vaitkuvienè and Dagys 2014).…”
Section: Conclusion: Implications For Stork Conservation and Power Lmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, the decreased availability of ruins or suitable large trees for building nests is a possibility that needs testing; (iv) a preferential selection for these structures because they provide fitness benefits such as reduced pressure from predators or a better productivity (Schulz 1998, Janiszewski et al 2015. Independently of the drivers, this trend for the increased use of man-made poles as nesting structures by storks seems to be widespread across Europe (Tryjanowski et al 2009, Janiszewski et al 2015. Electricity poles holding very high voltage power lines (managed by REN) supported an increasing share of the total white stork nests.…”
Section: Nest Site Selection: Increased Use Of Power Lines For Nestingmentioning
confidence: 99%