2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2020.101532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective growth of mosaic cells in chromosomal analysis of chorionic villi by conventional karyotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias between karyotyping and uncultured results was distinct in previous reports. [10][11][12][13][14] Most reports involving mosaicisms focused on CPM and true fetal mosaicisms (TFM) in chorionic villus sampling rather than TFM itself in AF. In the present study, we also compared the mosaic ratio of two cultures, and the CV value was as high as 118.5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bias between karyotyping and uncultured results was distinct in previous reports. [10][11][12][13][14] Most reports involving mosaicisms focused on CPM and true fetal mosaicisms (TFM) in chorionic villus sampling rather than TFM itself in AF. In the present study, we also compared the mosaic ratio of two cultures, and the CV value was as high as 118.5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karyotypes gradually change among species and genera. They are not static and can be replaced by genomic units, which corresponds to the genome theory in genetics [27]. The basic trend in karyotype evolution in higher plants is from a symmetrical to asymmetrical karyotype.…”
Section: Karyotype Evolutionary Trends Of Dandelion Chromosomes and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though karyotyping has been the gold standard prenatal diagnostic method for detection of chromosomal abnormalities, this technique has many limitations, such as labor intensive and longer laboratory turnaround time [ 7 ], higher failure rate for low quality and viability of samples [ 8 ]. Most important of all, smaller genomic imbalances including microdeletions and microduplications, which could be detected by chromosomal microarrays (CMA) are undetectable by karyotyping [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%