1996
DOI: 10.1021/ac960309u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective in Vivo and in Vitro Sampling of Proteins Using Miniature Ultrafiltration Sampling Probes

Abstract: The most widely used in vivo sampling technique, microdialysis sampling, provides important data on the extracellular concentration of low molecular mass (<1000-5000 Da) species. However, biological macromolecules of much greater mass (>20-90 kDa) have key in vivo roles as chemical messengers or are currently under consideration as biopharmaceuticals. Microdialysis, which utilizes a sampling process based upon analyte diffusion, is largely ineffective at monitoring the local, transient extracellular concentrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of the semipermeable membrane used will affect the size of molecules that are allowed in the ultrafiltrate sample. For small molecules, the recovery is (as for microdialysis) close to 100% (261,272), whereas the observed in vitro recovery for albumin has been 74 -100% depending on dialysis time (415), indicating that ultrafiltration can be used for sampling of macromolecules. To better allow for sampling of interstitial proteins, membranes with a molecular mass cutoff of 400 kDa have been used, and tissue fluid has been collected from ear (206) and abdominal skin (205) in mice using this approach, yielding protein concentrations of 100 and 8.6 g/ml, respectively.…”
Section: Capillary Ultrafiltrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The characteristics of the semipermeable membrane used will affect the size of molecules that are allowed in the ultrafiltrate sample. For small molecules, the recovery is (as for microdialysis) close to 100% (261,272), whereas the observed in vitro recovery for albumin has been 74 -100% depending on dialysis time (415), indicating that ultrafiltration can be used for sampling of macromolecules. To better allow for sampling of interstitial proteins, membranes with a molecular mass cutoff of 400 kDa have been used, and tissue fluid has been collected from ear (206) and abdominal skin (205) in mice using this approach, yielding protein concentrations of 100 and 8.6 g/ml, respectively.…”
Section: Capillary Ultrafiltrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since slow diffusion will affect recovery values, time-consuming recovery calculations are required with this technique [35]. Ultrafiltration sampling has been used to detect various molecules, such as calcium, potassium, sodium and glucose [36], but detection and identification of proteins/peptides in these samples was generally ignored until Schneiderheinze and Hogan sampled proteins in vivo and in vitro with miniature ultrafiltration sampling probes [37]. In our laboratory, we integrated an ultrafiltration technique with MS for in vivo sampling and identification of secreted proteins/peptides in tissue fluids [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Sampling Tissue Fluids Challenges In the Sampling Of Tissue mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membranes used as filters would be capable of differentiating between complexes which are different by an order of magnitude. Alternatively, other recent developments in the form of capillary electrophoresis, micro-dialysis, and miniaturized ultra-filtration can be used [RJ91,SH96,Bak96].…”
Section: Extended Model Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%