1966
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(66)90261-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective increase of brain dopamine induced by gamma-hydroxybutyrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
40
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
8
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since y-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to have no effect on monoamine oxidase or catechol-O-methyl transferase (Gessa et al, 1966), the enzymes which metabolize DA in the brain, the increase in DOPAC during the first hour after treatment with GHB-Na might reflect an increased metabolism of DA to this acid. Thus the total amount of DA formed during this time would be larger than that indicated by the observed increase in the concentration of DA.…”
Section: Discusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since y-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to have no effect on monoamine oxidase or catechol-O-methyl transferase (Gessa et al, 1966), the enzymes which metabolize DA in the brain, the increase in DOPAC during the first hour after treatment with GHB-Na might reflect an increased metabolism of DA to this acid. Thus the total amount of DA formed during this time would be larger than that indicated by the observed increase in the concentration of DA.…”
Section: Discusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have now extended our earlier findings to examine whether another GABA potentiating drug (pentobarbitone) will also confer protection and also investigated the effect of two compounds known to interfere with dopamine release in the brain, namely y-butyrolactone (Gessa et al, 1966;Anden et al, 1973) and ondansetron (Butler et al, 1988). The former inhibits dopamine release in the striatum (see for example Chrapusta et al, 1992), while the latter is a 5-HT3 antagonist (Butler et al, 1988) and inhibits dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (Kilpatrick et al, 1987;Costall et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the chloral hydrate anesthetized rat, both drugs are capable of reversibly suppressing impulse flow leading to a compensatory increase in DA levels in terminal field areas, including the dorsal and ventral striatum (Gessa et al 1966;Hillen and Noach 1971;Roth et al 1973;Shepard and Lehmann 1992). S(-)HA-966 is considerably more potent in this regard than either GHB or the R( ϩ ) enantiomer of HA-966, which also exhibits affinity for the glycine allosteric site on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (Singh et al 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%