2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Inhibition of Mirror Invariance for Letters Consolidated by Sleep Doubles Reading Fluency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some dyslexic children have difficulty discriminating visually similar letters (or digits) in isolation (Corballis, 2018; Fernandes, Vale, Martins, Morais, & Kolinsky, 2014), which might affect letter/digit string processing independently of any simultaneous processing deficit. This control is critical when VAS tasks are administered to beginning readers who have not yet developed efficient letter recognition skills (Pegado et al, 2014; Torres et al, 2021). Note that studies that controlled for single character visual identification efficiency reported similar single letters and symbols processing in dyslexic and typical readers (matched for chronological age) (Dubois et al, 2010; Stefanac et al, 2019), suggesting that performance was specific to multielement processing.…”
Section: Is Vas Performance a Marker Of Visuo‐attentional Processing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some dyslexic children have difficulty discriminating visually similar letters (or digits) in isolation (Corballis, 2018; Fernandes, Vale, Martins, Morais, & Kolinsky, 2014), which might affect letter/digit string processing independently of any simultaneous processing deficit. This control is critical when VAS tasks are administered to beginning readers who have not yet developed efficient letter recognition skills (Pegado et al, 2014; Torres et al, 2021). Note that studies that controlled for single character visual identification efficiency reported similar single letters and symbols processing in dyslexic and typical readers (matched for chronological age) (Dubois et al, 2010; Stefanac et al, 2019), suggesting that performance was specific to multielement processing.…”
Section: Is Vas Performance a Marker Of Visuo‐attentional Processing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises an important point: Post-training naps may be particularly powerful for enhancing longer-term retention when they are combined with nocturnal sleep. It has been shown that when 6-7-year-olds napped soon after mirror discrimination training this led to significantly after gains in reading fluency than compared to not napping after training, even when performance was tested after nocturnal sleep (Torres et al, 2021). These results support the claim that the delay between training and sleep onset is a critical factor, particularly in younger learners (e.g., Backhaus et al, 2008;James et al, 2020;Walker et al, 2020), and crucially, that the protective effects of a nap may work in combination with nocturnal sleep, as a useful memory enhancer.…”
Section: Daytime Naps Play a Protective Role In Novel Word Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, however, sleep facilitates the integration of newly learned written words into the lexicon (Wang et al, 2017) and supports generalization to new written words (Tamminen et al, 2012). It also boosts reading fluency in children (Torres et al, 2021) and, combined with recent evidence that sleep is associated with verbal learning in children more generally (James et al, 2017; Knowland et al, 2021), there is a strong basis to predict that sleep may impact learning at the foundation of literacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%