1980
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198001000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Lumbosacral Radiculography and Block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study was a diagnostic cohort study, 28 one was a RCT 42 and five studies were case series. 25,[43][44][45][46] Publication dates ranged from 1973 to 2010. Only one study 25 reported on the complications of SNRBs in the lumbar spine as the primary outcome of interest.…”
Section: Summary Of Test Accuracy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study was a diagnostic cohort study, 28 one was a RCT 42 and five studies were case series. 25,[43][44][45][46] Publication dates ranged from 1973 to 2010. Only one study 25 reported on the complications of SNRBs in the lumbar spine as the primary outcome of interest.…”
Section: Summary Of Test Accuracy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study included all patients (n = 1203) who received one or more therapeutic or diagnostic SNRBs in a radiology department with no details provided on their pre-test symptoms. The remaining six studies 28,[42][43][44][45][46] were all conducted among participants with radicular pain in a lower limb but were generally small (15-117 participants analysed). Table 7 gives full details of the SNRB injection methods and the adverse events reported.…”
Section: Summary Of Test Accuracy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, various different terminologies have been used in the literature, which include 'selective lumbosacral block' [29], 'selective nerve root blocks' [14,26], 'transforaminal epidural injections' [15,28] and 'peri-radicular infiltration' [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first introduced in 1971 as a diagnostic test for patients with clinical findings of nerve root irritation [16]. Tajima et al [29] later explored its therapeutic value and reported their results in 1980. Four studies conducted by Weiner et al [33], Lutz et al [15], Pfirrmann et al [26] and Karppinen et al [11] in the last decade have all demonstrated its value in relieving discogenic sciatic pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a too far medially placed needle the risk of epidural anesthesia is present. Although Tajima (8) claims that the image of the spinal nerve surrounded by contrast has diagnostic significance regarding the site of entrapment this has not be confirmed (9). The symptoms provoked at injection of contrast are noted and in particular whether the provoked pain is similar to the usual pain.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%