2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.104012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective memory of a psychological agent

Abstract: We consider a single psychological agent whose utility depends on his action, the state of the world, and the belief that he holds about that state. The agent is initially informed about the state and decides whether to memorize it, otherwise he has no recall. We model the memorization process by a multi-self game in which the privately informed first self voluntarily discloses information to the second self, who has identical preferences and acts upon the disclosed information. We identify broad categories of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hagenbach and Koessler [32] also present a setting related to Bénabou and Tirole [2]'s framework, but focus on studying how different classes of psychological utilities affect the existence of a full-disclosure equilibrium. Moreover, the decision-maker depicted in Hagenbach and Koessler [32] does not suffer from present bias, hence no dynamic inconsistency issues arise: the trade-off between perfect memory and forgetting arises because of belief-based utility, as in Chew et al [31]. Finally, the authors extend their model by adding exogenous memory failures: with some probability, Self 1 will not be able to remember the state of the world, even though Self 0 decided to recall.…”
Section: Other Motivated Memory Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagenbach and Koessler [32] also present a setting related to Bénabou and Tirole [2]'s framework, but focus on studying how different classes of psychological utilities affect the existence of a full-disclosure equilibrium. Moreover, the decision-maker depicted in Hagenbach and Koessler [32] does not suffer from present bias, hence no dynamic inconsistency issues arise: the trade-off between perfect memory and forgetting arises because of belief-based utility, as in Chew et al [31]. Finally, the authors extend their model by adding exogenous memory failures: with some probability, Self 1 will not be able to remember the state of the world, even though Self 0 decided to recall.…”
Section: Other Motivated Memory Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%