2019
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Production of Aromatics Directly from Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation

Abstract: Conversion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) to fuels and chemicals with the help of renewable hydrogen (H 2 ) is a very attractive approach to reduce CO 2 emissions and replace dwindling fossil fuels. However, it is still a great challenge to synthesize aromatics directly from CO 2 hydrogenation, because CO 2 is thermodynamically very stable, and the aromatics are highly unsaturated products with complex structures. Here, we demonstrate that the combination of the sodium-modified spinel oxide ZnFeO x , which alone sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
181
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
181
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… Detail hydrocarbon product distribution obtained over (A) well-defined mesoporous carbon (MPC) supported Fe–K in the range of C 15–27 , 95 (B) Fe–Cu, 98 (C) Na–Fe 3 O 4 (middle), 105 Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HZMS-5 (left), 105 and Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HMCM-22 (right), 109 (D) ZnFeO x -4.25Na (left) and ZnFeO x -4.25Na/HZSM-5 (right) under the reaction conditions of 320 °C, 3.0 MPa, H 2 /CO 2 = 3, and 4000 mL g –1 h –1 , 107 as well as (E) FeK1.5/HSG|HZSM-5 (SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 molar ratio of HZSM-5 = 50) catalysts during the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction. 110 Reprinted with permission from refs ( 95 ), ( 98 ), ( 105 ), ( 107 ) , ( 109 ), and ( 110 ). Copyright 2017 and 2020 Elsevier, Copyright 2017 Springer-Nature, and Copyright 2018 and 2019 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Co 2 Hydrogenation To Liquid Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Detail hydrocarbon product distribution obtained over (A) well-defined mesoporous carbon (MPC) supported Fe–K in the range of C 15–27 , 95 (B) Fe–Cu, 98 (C) Na–Fe 3 O 4 (middle), 105 Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HZMS-5 (left), 105 and Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HMCM-22 (right), 109 (D) ZnFeO x -4.25Na (left) and ZnFeO x -4.25Na/HZSM-5 (right) under the reaction conditions of 320 °C, 3.0 MPa, H 2 /CO 2 = 3, and 4000 mL g –1 h –1 , 107 as well as (E) FeK1.5/HSG|HZSM-5 (SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 molar ratio of HZSM-5 = 50) catalysts during the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction. 110 Reprinted with permission from refs ( 95 ), ( 98 ), ( 105 ), ( 107 ) , ( 109 ), and ( 110 ). Copyright 2017 and 2020 Elsevier, Copyright 2017 Springer-Nature, and Copyright 2018 and 2019 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Co 2 Hydrogenation To Liquid Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, high space time yields (STYs) of 0.405 and 0.125 mmol g − 1 h − 1 were achieved for AA and PA, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). Although numerous reports have been published on the direct hydrogenation of CO 2 to methanol 5,[42][43][44][45] , C 5+ liquid hydrocarbons [46][47][48][49][50] , and aromatics 19,20,[51][52][53] , studies dedicated to the direct CO 2 conversion to monocarboxylic acids have been extremely rare. A single article, which described the possibility of forming AA over a Ag-promoted Rh/SiO 2 catalyst, was published in the early 1990s 34 ; however, the reported production rate of AA was very low (~ 0.035 mmol g − 1 h − 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the hydrogenation of CO 2 to olefins or aromatics proceeds through two different routes: direct Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) route and indirect methanol route [3] . For the FTS route, CO 2 is firstly transformed to CO via reverse water‐gas shift (RWGS) reaction with simultaneously catalyzing conversion of CO into hydrocarbons by the typical Fischer‐Tropsch mechanism [4] . However, the produced olefins/aromatics obey the traditional Anderson‐Schulz‐Flory (ASF) distribution with very low selectivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%