2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8sc04338h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective recognition of choline phosphate by tripodal hexa-urea receptors with dual binding sites: crystal and solution evidence

Abstract: The tripodal hexa-urea receptors functionalized with aromatic terminal groups are able to selectively recognize choline phosphate with dual binding sites.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lately different scaffolds used in zwitterion recognition have been described: Costa published a receptor based on bis‐squaramides; the group of Moran has published different molecular receptors for the formation of non‐polar host‐guest complexes including a system based in a benzofuran skeleton and two pyridine molecules attached as sulfonamide and carboxamide groups or a receptor based on a chiral chromane . A choline phosphate receptor based on a tripodal hexa‐urea scaffold functionalized with aromatic terminal groups 21 was described by Yang and Wu . The complex is stabilized thanks to the dual binding mode where the phosphate is coordinated by the urea groups and the quaternary ammonium moiety is bound in a ‘composite aromatic box’ through cation‐π and hydrogen bonding interactions.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lately different scaffolds used in zwitterion recognition have been described: Costa published a receptor based on bis‐squaramides; the group of Moran has published different molecular receptors for the formation of non‐polar host‐guest complexes including a system based in a benzofuran skeleton and two pyridine molecules attached as sulfonamide and carboxamide groups or a receptor based on a chiral chromane . A choline phosphate receptor based on a tripodal hexa‐urea scaffold functionalized with aromatic terminal groups 21 was described by Yang and Wu . The complex is stabilized thanks to the dual binding mode where the phosphate is coordinated by the urea groups and the quaternary ammonium moiety is bound in a ‘composite aromatic box’ through cation‐π and hydrogen bonding interactions.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[64] A choline phosphate receptor based on a tripodal hexa-urea scaffold functionalized with aromatic terminal groups 21 was described by Yang and Wu. [65] The complex is stabilized thanks to the dual binding mode where the phosphate is coordinated by the urea groups and the quaternary ammonium moiety is bound in a 'composite aromatic box' through cation-π and hydrogen bonding interactions. A binding constants of 1.2 × 10 6 M À 1 in 2% D 2 O-DMSO-d 6 was obtained for this receptor and carnitine.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a double hydrogen bond donor, ureido derivatives may form double hydrogen bonds to a Y-type hydrogen bond binding site for example acetate or tetrahedral anions (such as SO4 2− ) [5]. It is more likely that a hydrogen bond may be formed between ureido and ureido, or between ureido and other molecules, etc., which may assemble into supramolecular compounds.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, several HBD receptors have been developed for the selective recognition of sulfate and phosphates in organic and (semi)aqueous media. 7,8 However, only a limited number of receptors have been demonstrated to selectively separate sulfate and phosphate from aqueous media in the presence of competing anions. 9 Both sulfate and phosphates have higher hydration energies in comparison to chloride, nitrate and other anions (Δ G HE −1080, −465, −350 and −305 kJ mol −1 for SO 4 2− , H 2 PO 4 − , Cl − and NO 3 − , respectively), which makes it challenging for majority of the HBD anion receptors to overcome the Hofmeister bias for sulfate and phosphate separation from water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%