2024
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c15480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Reduction of Multivariate Metal–Organic Frameworks for Advanced Electrocatalytic Cathodes in High Areal Capacity and Long-Life Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Mahmoud M. Kaid,
Mohammad K. Shehab,
Hong Fang
et al.

Abstract: Lithium−sulfur batteries hold great promise as nextgeneration high-energy-density batteries. However, their performance has been limited by the low cycling stability and sulfur utilization. Herein, we demonstrate that a selective reduction of the multivariate metal−organic framework, MTV-MOF-74 (Co, Ni, Fe), transforms the framework into a porous carbon decorated with bimetallic CoNi alloy and Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles capable of entrapping soluble lithium polysulfides while synergistically facilitating their rap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The era of energy diversification reflects the wisdom progress of human civilization, but limited earth resources need to be rationally allocated to maximize their utilization efficiency. Faced with the rising demand for sharp energy density iteration, the exploitation of highly efficient energy storage devices becomes an urgent need. Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) have been widely studied because of these advantages, such as high energy density (especially up to 2600 Wh kg –1 ), high theoretical specific capacity of active sulfur (1675 mAh g –1 ), and abundant resources. However, these issues perplex the research process of LSBs, including the unstable cathode frameworks caused by volume expansion/shrinkage for sulfur redox reaction (SRR) during charging/discharging cycles, the untimely transformation of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), inferior conductivity of sulfur source (S 8 ) and low-order phase reaction products (Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S), and the lithium dendrites on the anode, restricting its commercial exploration. In particular, the shuttle effect of dissolvable LiPSs (mainly Li 2 S 8 –Li 2 S 4 ) not only injures the mass transfer reaction of SRR within the cathode (a mass of intermediates travel to the anode side) but also causes the out-of-order deposition/stripping of active substances lithium (inactive dead-sulfur and dead-lithium are clustered in microzones). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The era of energy diversification reflects the wisdom progress of human civilization, but limited earth resources need to be rationally allocated to maximize their utilization efficiency. Faced with the rising demand for sharp energy density iteration, the exploitation of highly efficient energy storage devices becomes an urgent need. Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) have been widely studied because of these advantages, such as high energy density (especially up to 2600 Wh kg –1 ), high theoretical specific capacity of active sulfur (1675 mAh g –1 ), and abundant resources. However, these issues perplex the research process of LSBs, including the unstable cathode frameworks caused by volume expansion/shrinkage for sulfur redox reaction (SRR) during charging/discharging cycles, the untimely transformation of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), inferior conductivity of sulfur source (S 8 ) and low-order phase reaction products (Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S), and the lithium dendrites on the anode, restricting its commercial exploration. In particular, the shuttle effect of dissolvable LiPSs (mainly Li 2 S 8 –Li 2 S 4 ) not only injures the mass transfer reaction of SRR within the cathode (a mass of intermediates travel to the anode side) but also causes the out-of-order deposition/stripping of active substances lithium (inactive dead-sulfur and dead-lithium are clustered in microzones). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%