2020
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201901213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Reduction of Oxygen on Non‐Noble Metal Copper Nanocatalysts

Abstract: Efficient removal of molecular oxygen (O2) from flue gas is necessary to capture and utilize carbon dioxide (CO2) from fossil‐fuel sources. Herein, the catalytic reduction of O2 in simulated flue gases using alumina‐supported copper (Cu) nanostructures is presented. The Cu catalyst outperformed conventional palladium systems for the selectivity toward CO2 over carbon monoxide (CO). Varying the reactant feed ratio can lead to structural rearrangements at the surface of Cu nanoparticles, resulting in significant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have shown their positive progress towards effective O 2 removal. [11][12][13] Supported catalysts using noble metals (e.g., Pd and Pt) and non-noble metals (e.g., Cu) have shown a high removal efficiency of O 2 (495%) at relatively low temperatures (o773 K). [11][12][13] The gas composition in the feed stream has been reported to have a significant consequence on the reactions involving O 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have shown their positive progress towards effective O 2 removal. [11][12][13] Supported catalysts using noble metals (e.g., Pd and Pt) and non-noble metals (e.g., Cu) have shown a high removal efficiency of O 2 (495%) at relatively low temperatures (o773 K). [11][12][13] The gas composition in the feed stream has been reported to have a significant consequence on the reactions involving O 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] Supported catalysts using noble metals (e.g., Pd and Pt) and non-noble metals (e.g., Cu) have shown a high removal efficiency of O 2 (495%) at relatively low temperatures (o773 K). [11][12][13] The gas composition in the feed stream has been reported to have a significant consequence on the reactions involving O 2 . Kuhn et al 12 reported that under O 2 -rich or near stoichiometric conditions (O 2 /CH 4 = 2) in the feed stream, complete CH 4 oxidation was the major reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colloidal nanocrystals made of Cu have found widespread use in applications ranging from electronics to optoelectronics, plasmonics, catalysis, sensing, and biomedicine. , For example, Cu nanowires have been demonstrated as a potential replacement for indium–tin oxide (ITO) films in the fabrication of transparent and flexible electrodes, whereas Cu nanoparticles have been widely used as catalysts toward water–gas shift, gas detoxification, and CO 2 sequestration reactions . When prepared as nanostructures, Cu is also known to exhibit localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) in the visible and near-infrared regions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 For example, Cu nanowires have been demonstrated as a potential replacement for indium−tin oxide (ITO) films in the fabrication of transparent and flexible electrodes, 3 whereas Cu nanoparticles have been widely used as catalysts toward water−gas shift, 4 gas detoxification, 5 reactions. 6 When prepared as nanostructures, Cu is also known to exhibit localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) in the visible and near-infrared regions. 7 Recently, Cu-based nanostructures have attracted ever-growing interest owing to their remarkable selectivity toward hydrocarbons and multicarbon (C 2+ ) species during the electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a reducing gas, such as hydrogen (H 2 ), carbon monoxide (CO), and methane (CH 4 ) at stoichiometric ratios with O 2 , has been effective in removing O 2 to below 1000 ppm. However, H 2 is more expensive and may react with CO 2 via the reverse water gas shift reaction, and CO for O 2 reduction demands narrow specifications for both CO and O 2 . , Therefore, CH 4 is a preferred choice of reductant because of both economic and technical considerations. In another recent study, catalytic reduction of O 2 from flue gas with noble metals has also been reported, but the work has little relevance to pressurized flue gas .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%