Selective Repair of Motor Branches in the Femoral Nerve by Transferring the Motor Branches of Obturator Nerve

Abstract

Background Anterior branch of the obturator nerve transfer has been proven as an effective method for femoral nerve injuries, but the patient still has difficulty in rising and squatting, up and downstairs. Here, we presented a novel neurotization procedure of selectively repairing 3 motor branches of the femoral nerve by transferring motor branches of the obturator nerve in the thigh level and assessing its anatomical feasibility. Methods Eight adult cadavers (16 thighs) were dissected. The nerve overlap distance between the gracilis branch and the rectus femoris (RF) branch, the adductor longus (AL) branch and the vastus medialis (VM) branch, as well as the adductor magnus (AM) branch and the vastus intermedius (VI) branch were measured. Also, the axon counts of the donor and recipient nerve were evaluated by histological evaluation. Results In all specimens, nerve overlap of at least 2.1 cm was observed in all 16 dissected thighs between the donor and recipient nerve branches, and the repair appeared to be without tension. There is no significant difference in the axon counts between gracilis branch (598 ± 83) and the RF branch (709 ± 151). The axon counts of the AL branch (601 ± 93) was about half of axon counts of the VM branch (1423 ± 189), and the axon counts of AM branch (761 ± 110) was also about half of the VI branch (1649 ± 281). Conclusions This novel technique of the combined nerve transfers below the inguinal ligament, specifically the gracilis branch to the RF branch, the AL branch to the VM branch, and the AM branch to the VI branch, is anatomically feasible. It provides a promising alternative in the repair of femoral nerve injuries and an anatomical basis for the clinical application of motor branches of the obturator nerve transfer to repair the motor portion of the injured femoral nerve.

Histomorphometry of the Sural Nerve for Use as a CFNG in Facial Reanimation Procedures

“…In all reanimation procedures, remarkably in CFNG, the axonal load plays a crucial role. To further investigate axon capacity in CFNG procedures, we compared our findings with relevant studies that provided data on donor and recipient nerves (Table 3) [30][31][32]. [32] Gracilis branch, obturator nerve 598 ± 83 [31] For cross-facial nerve grafts, a capacity greater than 900 donor axons was identified as a promising indicator for favorable outcomes in midfacial reanimation using free muscle grafts.…”

“…To further investigate axon capacity in CFNG procedures, we compared our findings with relevant studies that provided data on donor and recipient nerves (Table 3) [30][31][32]. [32] Gracilis branch, obturator nerve 598 ± 83 [31] For cross-facial nerve grafts, a capacity greater than 900 donor axons was identified as a promising indicator for favorable outcomes in midfacial reanimation using free muscle grafts. Furthermore, Terzis et al observed a correlation between donor axonal input and the axon numbers at the distal end of the nerve graft.…”