1990
DOI: 10.1016/0921-8777(90)90071-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective repair of specific chromatin domains in UV-irradiated cells from xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Venema and co-workers (34) found that the residual repair capacity in XP-C was highly selective for active genes. Similar results were obtained in our laboratory; we noted very rapid repair in the active ,-actin and DHFR genes but poor repair in a silent sequence from the inactive X chromosome (35). In contrast, the cells from CS patients are selectively deficient in the repair of active genes.…”
Section: Models To Explain Finestructure Heterogeneity In Dna Repairsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Venema and co-workers (34) found that the residual repair capacity in XP-C was highly selective for active genes. Similar results were obtained in our laboratory; we noted very rapid repair in the active ,-actin and DHFR genes but poor repair in a silent sequence from the inactive X chromosome (35). In contrast, the cells from CS patients are selectively deficient in the repair of active genes.…”
Section: Models To Explain Finestructure Heterogeneity In Dna Repairsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The reversed situation exists in rodent cells and in human XPC cell lines that remove dimers in only a relatively small part of the genome. In these cells, transcribed strands of active DNA are repaired efficiently, whereas dimers in the remainder of the genome are not removed, which results in only a modest UV sensitivity of these cell types (3,12,18,46,47). Preferential repair of the transcribed strand has been shown to exist in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the URA3 gene on a minichromosome (33), for the chromosomal as well as episomal RPB2 gene (34), and for the transcriptionally induced GAL7 gene (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In normal human cells (2,3), Escherichia coli (4), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (5)(6)(7)(8), both strands of active genes are repaired, but CPDs are removed more rapidly from the transcribed strands than from the nontranscribed strands. In rodent cell lines (2), in human xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) group C cell lines (3,9,10), and in mutant rad7 and radl6 S. cerevisiae strains (11), CPDs are removed from the transcribed strands of genes, while repair in nontranscribed DNA is inefficient. Conversely, mutations in the E. coli mfd gene (12), the human Cockayne syndrome (CS) group A and B genes (13), and the S. cerevisiae CS-B gene homolog (14) abolish transcription-coupled repair without significantly influencing repair of nontranscribed DNA; repair in transcribed and nontranscribed DNA occurs at similar rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%