2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0860-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective retina therapy (SRT) of chronic subfoveal fluid after surgery of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: three case reports

Abstract: SRT is a safe treatment. Visual acuity improved after SRT, even in subfoveal irradiations. SRT is an option to support subretinal fluid reabsorption. In this situation where no other therapeutical options are established, SRT may be a beneficial treatment for chronic subfoveal fluid accumulation after retinal detachment surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 By applying laser pulses that are shorter than the thermal confinement time of the absorbing structure, the risk of thermal damage to the surrounding healthy retina and choroid is reduced. [10][11][12] The origin of the selectivity for RPE cells relies on the formation of very short-lived (ls, microseconds) vapor bubbles generated around the strongly absorbing melanosomes within the cells, which disrupt the cellular membrane due to the temporarily strongly increased cell volume. 13 Several experimental studies have confirmed the safety of SRT and have established the therapeutic range of laser irradiation for retinal tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 By applying laser pulses that are shorter than the thermal confinement time of the absorbing structure, the risk of thermal damage to the surrounding healthy retina and choroid is reduced. [10][11][12] The origin of the selectivity for RPE cells relies on the formation of very short-lived (ls, microseconds) vapor bubbles generated around the strongly absorbing melanosomes within the cells, which disrupt the cellular membrane due to the temporarily strongly increased cell volume. 13 Several experimental studies have confirmed the safety of SRT and have established the therapeutic range of laser irradiation for retinal tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this several treatment options have been described. [9][10][11][12] Several aetiological or associated factors have been identified: type of surgery performed, pre-operative macula involvement, position, extent, and duration of the retinal detachment. In one series it was reported that persistent submacular fluid was found in 36% of cases that were clinically considered to have a fully attached macula prior to surgery; which raised the possibility that the fluid is exudative rather than persistent subretinal fluid from the retinal detachment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,[10][11][12][13]43,44 In those studies, lesion intensities were controlled by a variety of inconsistent criteria, which produced different outcomes, makes lesion characteristics incompatible and prevents meta-analyses. Automatic laser exposure control as presented in this study is, to the authors' knowledge, the only functional way to accurately create well-defined lesion intensities above and below the visibility threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pilot studies have collected evidence that subvisible treatment and SRT are clinically effective. 8,[10][11][12][13] The term subvisible is commonly applied for lesions that are at least ophthalmoscopically invisible during the treatment. Due to inter-and intraindividual variation of light transmission, light absorption, and tissue sensitivity, the biological effect of a laser irradiation cannot be predicted from laser parameters alone, such as power, irradiation time, and irradiation diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%