2012
DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2012.2205244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Sampling for Beat Tracking Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, high agreement among beat trackers does not imply high agreement among human tappers; a significant amount of fragments with a BT-MMA D above the threshold has quite low TAP-MMA D values (lower-right rectangle). This is quite different from the result for Western music presented in Holzapfel et al (2012), where this quadrant was not populated at all, indicating that good beat tracker performance always implied high agreement among human tappers. Inspection of the human annotations related to the fragments in the lower-right quadrant revealed that they are indeed characterized by a large variability for each fragment.…”
Section: Human Annotations Versus Beat Trackerscontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, high agreement among beat trackers does not imply high agreement among human tappers; a significant amount of fragments with a BT-MMA D above the threshold has quite low TAP-MMA D values (lower-right rectangle). This is quite different from the result for Western music presented in Holzapfel et al (2012), where this quadrant was not populated at all, indicating that good beat tracker performance always implied high agreement among human tappers. Inspection of the human annotations related to the fragments in the lower-right quadrant revealed that they are indeed characterized by a large variability for each fragment.…”
Section: Human Annotations Versus Beat Trackerscontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…First, some of the 17 approaches are pure tempo estimators that give only tempo values in bpm, and not beat sequences. Second, in Holzapfel et al (2012) it was shown that this selection increases diversity and accuracy of the included beat sequences, and, third, this selection guarantees comparability with results presented in Holzapfel et al (2012). Comparing beat sequences is not a straightforward task; two sequences should be considered to agree not only in case of a perfect fit, but also in the presence of deviations that result in perceptually equal acceptable beat annotations.…”
Section: Comparison: Measuring Beat Sequence/annotation Agreementmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main assumption is that if several algorithms agree on the estimation of a 'melody' pitch, it is more likely that the estimation is correct. Related works also use agreement between algorithms for beat estimation (Holzapfel et al 2012;Zapata, Davies, and Gómez 2014).…”
Section: Proposed Combination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%