2009
DOI: 10.2174/1871524910909030172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Sigma-1 (σ1) Receptor Antagonists: Emerging Target for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain

Abstract: A large number of therapeutic roles have been proposed for sigma(1) receptors but the involvement of sigma(1) receptor in non-acute pain had not been well explored up to now. sigma(1) receptor knock-out mice became available offering us the possibility to study the role of sigma(1) receptor in nociception, particularly in models where central sensitization processes play a significant role. Given the attractive therapeutic potential, we have developed a chemical program aimed at the discovery of novel and sele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
77
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We now extend those results by showing that this s 1 antagonist as well as BD-1063 enhance opioid antinociception against a different type of nociceptive (mechanical) stimulus, and more importantly, that the enhanced antinociception is mediated peripherally (see below). Moreover, we show that opioid-induced mechanical antinociception is clearly potentiated in s 1 -KO mice, which contrasts with the previously reported absence of modulation of opioid thermal antinociception in s 1 -KO mice (Díaz et al, 2009;Vidal-Torres et al, 2013). These apparently contradictory results seem to be related to the type of sensory stimulation used, and may be attributable to the known differences in the neurochemical mechanisms of thermal and mechanical opioid antinociception (Kuraishi et al, 1985;Wegert et al, 1997).…”
Section: Modulation Of Peripheral M-opioidcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now extend those results by showing that this s 1 antagonist as well as BD-1063 enhance opioid antinociception against a different type of nociceptive (mechanical) stimulus, and more importantly, that the enhanced antinociception is mediated peripherally (see below). Moreover, we show that opioid-induced mechanical antinociception is clearly potentiated in s 1 -KO mice, which contrasts with the previously reported absence of modulation of opioid thermal antinociception in s 1 -KO mice (Díaz et al, 2009;Vidal-Torres et al, 2013). These apparently contradictory results seem to be related to the type of sensory stimulation used, and may be attributable to the known differences in the neurochemical mechanisms of thermal and mechanical opioid antinociception (Kuraishi et al, 1985;Wegert et al, 1997).…”
Section: Modulation Of Peripheral M-opioidcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is important to test whether the widely reported enhancement of morphine antinociception by s 1 inhibition (Chien and Pasternak 1993;Mei and Pasternak 2007;Díaz et al, 2009;Sánchez-Fernández et al, 2013) also occurs with other clinically relevant m opioids. It was recently reported that the systemic (subcutaneous) administration of S1RA enhanced antinociception against a thermal stimulus induced by morphine and other systemically administered centrally penetrant m-opioid analgesics (fentanyl, oxycodone, buprenorphine, and tramadol) (Vidal-Torres et al, 2013).…”
Section: Modulation Of Peripheral M-opioidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining response to capsaicin in σ 1 -KO and WT animals treated with the highest doses of σ 1 receptor antagonists indicates that mechanisms other than σ 1 receptor activation are also implicated in the acute visceral pain induced by capsaicin in both mouse types. It was previously reported that σ 1 receptor antagonists had no effect on acute pain induced by thermal or mechanical stimuli to the paw skin [22][23][24]39 but almost completely abolished the first phase of formalininduced pain 23,27 and, in the present study, partially reduced capsaicin-induced visceral pain-related behaviors. These data indicate that the analgesic actions of σ 1 receptor antagonists may depend on the type of pain (cutaneous, somatic, or visceral) and on the nociceptive stimulus applied (thermal, mechanical, or chemical).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The finding that S1R plays a role in HCV infection is of particular interest because, in addition to endogenous ligands, S1R activity can be modulated in vivo by a large number of drug-like ligands (70), some of which have been proven to be useful in the treatment of pain (71) and in experimental models for pathologies of the central nervous system (55). Although we have previously shown that putative S1R ligands inhibit HCV infection, most of these compounds selectively and efficiently inhibit viral entry (35), a process that is not altered by S1R downregulation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%