2014
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2014.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective solution shearing deposition of high performance TIPS-pentacene polymorphs through chemical patterning

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An impressive average hole mobility of 2.5 cm 2 V –1 s –1 with a maximum value up to 2.9 cm 2 V –1 s –1 was achieved with a shearing speed of 2.1 mm/s. This mobility outperforms most of previously reported solution-processed TIPS-PEN films as well as vacuum-deposited TIPS-PEN films on modified substrates (measured in ambient condition). , Note that such mobility values are directly extracted from the transfer curves without subtracting the gap areas, hence, a higher value of intrinsic mobility can be expected. By further increasing the shearing speed of TIPS-TAP, the resulting transistor performance will decrease because of the discontinuous morphologies (indicated above).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An impressive average hole mobility of 2.5 cm 2 V –1 s –1 with a maximum value up to 2.9 cm 2 V –1 s –1 was achieved with a shearing speed of 2.1 mm/s. This mobility outperforms most of previously reported solution-processed TIPS-PEN films as well as vacuum-deposited TIPS-PEN films on modified substrates (measured in ambient condition). , Note that such mobility values are directly extracted from the transfer curves without subtracting the gap areas, hence, a higher value of intrinsic mobility can be expected. By further increasing the shearing speed of TIPS-TAP, the resulting transistor performance will decrease because of the discontinuous morphologies (indicated above).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The responsivities (defined as ΔG/G 0 , in which ΔG is the conductivity changing value during NO 2 exposure, G 0 is the conductivity before analyte exposing) generally linearly increase with the NO 2 concentration and exhibit a sensitivity (defined as the slope of the linear relationship of responsivity versus NO 2 concentration) as high as 1300% ppm −1 (Figure 5f), which is higher than our previous high quality TIPS-PEN films grown on vacuum deposited molecular templates and superior to most of the organic semiconductor-based NO 2 sensors. 42 In addition, the crystalline films also show a higher responsivity larger than 200% when the NO 2 concentration is down to 0.5 ppm, suggesting the potential for ppb level detection (Figure 5g). We also checked the sensing performance after storage in ambient condition for about 50 days, the responsivity to 1 ppm of NO 2 still maintains in the range of 450%, suggesting the good stability of the sensor (Figure S13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Micropillars on the blade induced an accelerated flow rate in the narrow spacing, which enhanced the mass transport in the solution and avoided the branch-like growth as well as voids in the crystalline film. To tune the molecular arrangements in the crystals, more adjustments on the blade, , substrate surface (including wettability or patterned strips), ,, solvent, or external electric fields are applied and studied. Peng et al tried dual blade shearing to fabricate monolayer-based single-crystal gas sensors, where the second shearing is designed to remove the extra multilayers of preformed crystalline films.…”
Section: Pathways Toward Solution-grown Organic Single Crystals In La...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contribution is helpful to our aim because it generally enhances the selection effect of the patterning and the crystalline domain size of printed structures, as compared to that observed for film prepared by conventional methods. Eventually, confinement can drive the polymorph formation toward a specific polymorph [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], which could be different from the stable species formed by conventional deposition [ 33 ]. Other parameters that can play an active role toward the formation of a specific polymorph can be locally imposed by the nature of the surface [ 34 ], stamp [ 29 ], solvent, or by the shrinkage rate [ 24 ] and temperature [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%