“…The ELISA has other restrictions such as prozone effect, analytical noise, and limits of detection and quantitation. Moreover, ELISAs are expensive and demand sophisticated and complex instruments. − The newer techniques like Raman spectroscopy, − mass spectrometry, , and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy , offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity, but their complexity, cost, and operational demands hinder wider clinical application. − On the other hand, a spectrofluorimetric technique in general offers some merits including simplicity, sensitivity, and reliability due to its superior analytical performance Thus, a spectrofluorimetric technique provides both cost-effective and easy-to-implement analytical methods that could be amended to be used in different clinical applications providing accurate results. , Coupling spectrofluorimetric techniques with nanotechnology offers a powerful approach for various applications. , Furthermore, coupling nanotechnology and smart nanomaterials with spectrofluorimetric methods allowed the fabrication of different optical sensors that permitted the direct probing of trace analytes and diagnostic biomarkers. The nanooptical biosensors enhanced the sensitivity of spectrofluorimetric methods via reducing detection and quantitation limits and improving trace analysis even in small sample sizes.…”