2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective strong and weak disposability in efficiency analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the general case (including some convex technologies), the nonnegativity of one-sided scale elasticities cannot be assured as, for example, in technologies with weakly disposable good outputs (Mehdiloo and Podinovski, 2019). In such cases the DRS and CRS types of RTS may require a more refined definition accounting for the possibility of the negative scale elasticity.…”
Section: Returns To Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the general case (including some convex technologies), the nonnegativity of one-sided scale elasticities cannot be assured as, for example, in technologies with weakly disposable good outputs (Mehdiloo and Podinovski, 2019). In such cases the DRS and CRS types of RTS may require a more refined definition accounting for the possibility of the negative scale elasticity.…”
Section: Returns To Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the methodological framework of DEA, one can choose from a large number of production technologies based on different production assumptions, or axioms (Färe, Grosskopf, & Lovell, 1985). Depending on the context, such technologies may, for example, incorporate multiple component processes (Imanirad, Cook, & Zhu, 2013;Podinovski, Olesen, & Sarrico, 2018), unobserved DMUs (Thanassoulis & Allen, 1998), additional information in the form of weight restrictions and production trade-offs (Allen, Athanassopoulos, Dyson, & Thanassoulis, 1997;Podinovski, 2004c;Podinovski & Bouzdine-Chameeva, 2013), weakly disposable inputs and outputs (Mehdiloo & Podinovski, 2019), limits on the values of inputs and outputs (Cooper, Pastor, Borras, Aparicio, & Pastor, 2011) and specific network structures (Kao, 2017;Sahoo, Zhu, Tone, & Klemen, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it is essential that the variables used are capable of satisfactorily representing the efficiency of the chosen decision-making units. Mehdiloo and Podinovski (2019) discuss the problems arising from the choice of inputs or outputs that do not satisfactorily represent the proposed efficiency concept, and the mathematical influence of redundant variables that ultimately overlap. Considering the importance of choosing variables that satisfactorily represent the concept of efficiency presented by Farrell (1957), the selection of the variables was based on the theoretical framework, and it was subsequently validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with industry experts in Brazil.…”
Section: Quantitative Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class of polyhedral technologies including the standard CRS and VRS technologies of Charnes et al (1978) and Banker et al (1984), the non-increasing and non-decreasing returns-to-scale technologies (Färe et al 1983, Seiford andThrall 1990), and their extensions by production trade-offs which are dual terms to weight restrictions (Podinovski 2004b). Further examples include the hybrid returns-to-scale technology based on the idea of selective proportionality between certain subsets of inputs and outputs (Podinovski 2004a), technologies with multiple component processes, including those with joint or shared inputs and outputs (Cherchye et al 2013, Podinovski et al 2018, and models based on (selective) weak disposability of inputs and outputs (Mehdiloo and Podinovski 2019). Finally, the underlying technologies of various network DEA models (Färe and Grosskopf 2000) are also polyhedral.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%