2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2005.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective transport of attached particles across the pulp–froth interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is well known that fine particles have a higher recovery than coarse particles through the froth. Fines are less likely to detach from bubbles and drain from the froth if they have reported to the froth by true flotation and they also do not drain as easily if reporting to the froth by entrainment [34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is well known that fine particles have a higher recovery than coarse particles through the froth. Fines are less likely to detach from bubbles and drain from the froth if they have reported to the froth by true flotation and they also do not drain as easily if reporting to the froth by entrainment [34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were however based on unsized observations of the various flotation cells. As a follow on from this earlier work Seaman (2006) sought to study the selective nature of the froth, with regards to particle size and their liberation characteristics. The results of his investigation highlighted two very important mechanisms causing coarse and poorly liberated particles to have lower froth recovery.…”
Section: Froth Phase Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine this parameter it is necessary to have a measure of the froth recovery for that particular component in addition to the overall rate constant and numerous researchers have published methods of doing so (Rahman, et al, 2013;Alexander, 2006;Seaman, 2006;Savassi, 1998;Savassi, et al, 1997;Vera, et al, 1999;Falutsu & Dobby, 1992;Gorain, 1997).…”
Section: Predicting the Flotation Behaviour Of Composite Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical mineral recovery as a function of particle size is shown in Figure 2.12, and the maximum recovery is typically between 20 -150 µm (Trahar 1981). The low floatability of coarse particles is mainly due to the particle-detachment from bubbles as a result of turbulence within the pulp and upon hitting the pulp-froth interface (Schulze 1977, Crawford and Ralston 1988, Vera et al 1999, Seaman et al 2006). In addition, increasing the particle size may result in longer induction times that affect attachment efficiency and a commensurate deterioration in floatability (Feng and Aldrich 1999).…”
Section: Particle Size Distribution and Its Effect On Flotationmentioning
confidence: 99%