2017
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0622-17.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Vulnerability of Striatal D2 versus D1 Dopamine Receptor-Expressing Medium Spiny Neurons in HIV-1 Tat Transgenic Male Mice

Abstract: Despite marked regional differences in HIV susceptibility within the CNS, there has been surprisingly little exploration into the differential vulnerability among neuron types and the circuits they underlie. The dorsal striatum is especially susceptible, harboring high viral loads and displaying marked neuropathology, with motor impairment a frequent manifestation of chronic infection. However, little is known about the response of individual striatal neuron types to HIV or how this disrupts function. Therefor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), which suggests with the higher level of balance and coordination performance female mice are vulnerable to HIV-1 Tatinduced damage. Similar differences have been noted in HIV transgenic rat and Tat transgenic mice [67,81], which may be due to selective neuronal vulnerability to HIV Tat [82].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…3), which suggests with the higher level of balance and coordination performance female mice are vulnerable to HIV-1 Tatinduced damage. Similar differences have been noted in HIV transgenic rat and Tat transgenic mice [67,81], which may be due to selective neuronal vulnerability to HIV Tat [82].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Spine detection was manually corrected if necessary. Classification of spines into stubby, mushroom-like and filopodia was performed using the Imaris XTension classify spines with following definitions: stubby: spine length <0.75 μm; mushroom: spine length <3.5 μm, spine head width >0.35 μm and spine head width >spine neck width; filopodia: when it did not fit the criteria mentioned above ( Schier et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spine detection was manually corrected if necessary. Classification of spines into stubby, mushroom-like and filopodia was performed using the Imaris XTension classify spines with following definitions: stubby: spine length < 0.75 μm; mushroom: spine length < 3.5μm, spine head width >0.35 μm and spine head width > spine neck width; filopodia: when it did not fit the criteria mentioned above 55 .…”
Section: Confocal Microscopy and Dendritic Spine Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%