2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selectivity of Pb(II) transport across polymer inclusion membranes doped with imidazole azothiacrown ethers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intrinsic molar volumes of carries 2 and 3 are 169.5 mol/cm 3 (HLB = 4.87), while for carrier 1, it is 152.26 mol/cm 3 (HLB = 8.82). The roughness of investigated PIMs is comparable with that found for polymer membrane with derivative imidazole azothiacrown ethers prepared by Ulewicz et al 28 , which is equal from 3.3 to 5.3 nm. Also, small values of roughness (equal to 4.6 nm) showed polymer membranes with D2EHPA prepared by Salazar-Alvarez et al 34 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intrinsic molar volumes of carries 2 and 3 are 169.5 mol/cm 3 (HLB = 4.87), while for carrier 1, it is 152.26 mol/cm 3 (HLB = 8.82). The roughness of investigated PIMs is comparable with that found for polymer membrane with derivative imidazole azothiacrown ethers prepared by Ulewicz et al 28 , which is equal from 3.3 to 5.3 nm. Also, small values of roughness (equal to 4.6 nm) showed polymer membranes with D2EHPA prepared by Salazar-Alvarez et al 34 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A surface characterization study of the polymer membranes was performed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) according to the procedure described in paper 28 . The analysis of surface pore characteristics was made using the AFM image processing program NanoScope v.5.12, which enabled the calculation of two parameters, roughness (R q ) and porosity (ε).…”
Section: Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows that working with a high concentration factor will result in an even higher concentration of the ion of interest in the strip phase. In Table 3 the Permeability coefficient, P (lm/s), initial flux, J i (lmol/m 2 s), time of recovery (h) and recovery factor RF% for lead ion are compared with the corresponding values reported for the recovery of lead ions based on different carriers and different methods, so far reported in the literature [24,28,[31][32][33][34]. In terms of shorter time of recovery, higher J and P, and higher recovery percent, it is apparent that this work is sometimes superior and in some cases similar to the recovery of lead reported previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several extractants have been proposed for separation of Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions, e.g., carboxylic acids [10], derivatives of phosphinic acid [11], derivatives of acid amides, trioctylamine [11], alkylphenylamines [12], complex oximes [13], crown ethers [14][15][16] derivatives of ketones [17][18][19][20], derivatives of pyridine [21,22], as well as alkyl derivatives of imidazole [6,[23][24][25] and quaternary ammonium salt [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%