2015
DOI: 10.4172/2376-1318.1000126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selenium Form-Dependent Anti-Carcinogenesis: Preferential Elimination of Oxidant-Damaged Prostate Cancer Cell Populations by Methylseleninic Acid is Not Shared by Selenite

Abstract: Selenium has received considerable attention as a cancer preventive agent. But the puzzling, disquieting results of the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) have called into question how much is really understood about the biology behind selenium and cancer risk. This predicament should provide researchers with a renewed stimulus for exploring mechanisms of selenium anti-carcinogenesis. One such line of inquiry is homeostatic housecleaning -that selenium can preferentially eliminate DNA-dama… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By avoiding a mindset of naïve substitution-seeing one form of nutrient as equivalent to another-we make surer progress toward understanding the implications of our laboratory findings and side-stepping errant assumptions. (Chiang et al 2015) As discoverers, each of us needs to avoid the trap that we have termed 'naïve substitution', the pesky product of insufficient exactitude with language. One might be inclined to ask just how well are scientists staying out of this trap?…”
Section: Figure 8 John Deweymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By avoiding a mindset of naïve substitution-seeing one form of nutrient as equivalent to another-we make surer progress toward understanding the implications of our laboratory findings and side-stepping errant assumptions. (Chiang et al 2015) As discoverers, each of us needs to avoid the trap that we have termed 'naïve substitution', the pesky product of insufficient exactitude with language. One might be inclined to ask just how well are scientists staying out of this trap?…”
Section: Figure 8 John Deweymentioning
confidence: 99%