2016
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4162-8725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seletividade aparente de bovinos em pastos de capim-braquiária sob períodos de diferimento

Abstract: RESUMOObjetivou-se compreender o efeito do período de diferimento sobre a seletividade aparente de bovinos pelos componentes morfológicos e de valor nutritivo do pasto de Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk. Adotaram-se o esquema de parcela subdividida e o delineamento em blocos ao acaso com duas repetições. Foram estudados quatro períodos de diferimento (73, 103, 131 e 163 dias) e duas amostras de forragem (disponível na pastagem (DP) e obtida pela simulação de pastejo (SP)). As percentagens de lâmina foliar vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moderate shading in the silvopastoral system does not interfere with the pasture carrying capacity, nutritional value, dry matter intake, or animal performance compared to the monoculture system (26) . Therefore, variations in CP, NDF, and ADF contents found in this study are more closely related to the stockpiling period and the dry season (27) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Moderate shading in the silvopastoral system does not interfere with the pasture carrying capacity, nutritional value, dry matter intake, or animal performance compared to the monoculture system (26) . Therefore, variations in CP, NDF, and ADF contents found in this study are more closely related to the stockpiling period and the dry season (27) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, in 2018, the LL in the middle was similar to the end of the grazing period, while in 2019, the intermediate period of grazing presented higher LL values compared to the final period but lower than those at the beginning of grazing. As for live and dead leaves in the canopy, components preferred by animals and with better nutritional value compared to the stem (M. E. R. Santos et al, 2016) had similar values at the beginning of the grazing period among the SL treatments. Therefore, the structure of stockpiled pastures was determined by the stem and how it was distributed in the vertical profile of the canopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While the morphological characteristics of forage originated from samples collected close to the ground (total forage mass), the nutritional value variables originated from samples collected via simulated grazing. In this context, M. E. R. Santos et al (2016) evaluated the selectivity of cattle under grazing stockpiled signalgrass (Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk) with different stockpiling periods (73, 103, 131 and 163 days).…”
Section: The Percentage Of Dead Leaves (Dls) Was Influenced By the In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent selectivity index (ASI) done by the animals in relation to the morphological components of the pasture was calculated according to Santos et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%