2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574711000567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-adaptive Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots using range finders

Abstract: Abstract-In order to achieve the autonomy of mobile robots, effective localization is a necessary prerequisite. In this paper, we propose an improved Monte Carlo localization algorithm using self-adaptive samples, abbreviated as SAMCL. By employing a pre-caching technique to reduce the on-line computational burden, SAMCL is more efficient than regular MCL. Further, we define the concept of similar energy region (SER), which is a set of poses (grid cells) having similar energy with the robot in the robot space.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current observation is also included in the proposal distribution in [22]. Zhang et al [23] have developed the Self-Adaptive MC localization method. They have defined the concept of similar energy region to distribute more efficiently the samples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current observation is also included in the proposal distribution in [22]. Zhang et al [23] have developed the Self-Adaptive MC localization method. They have defined the concept of similar energy region to distribute more efficiently the samples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the most efficient robot system is not able to have the perfect behavior 50 necessary to execute all robotic missions that people could imagine. A fault may generate relatively dramatic effects such as a significant decrease in the robot's performance, an aborted mission, loss or crash of the robot, or human injuries.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, several techniques proposed to overcome the effect of process noise on SLAM performance could be grouped into three: (a) Splitting the area into sub-maps as well as re-observing the sub-map more than once (L. Paz and Neira, 2006), (Blanco et al, 2007), (Huang et al, 2006) and (Castellanos et al, 2007); (b) an appearance-based approach which tries to avoid the use of odometer data in estimating the robot position (Seadan et al, 2007), (L. M. Paz et al, 2008), (Davison and Murray, 2002), (Porta and Krose, 2006) and (Koenig et al, 2008); (c) engaging an adaptive strategy as a means of controlling the motion of the robot (Cho et al, 2002), (Zhang et al, 2012), (Harter, 2005) and (Härter and Campos Velho, 2008). It appears that none of these approaches has thoroughly investigated the manner in which the process noise affects predictions and estimations in SLAM with the view of addressing it.…”
Section: Slam Have Been Found Helpful In Several Application Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%