2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-013-1022-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-adaptive, multipopulation differential evolution in dynamic environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…(12)) found in the first experiment, was compared to the DOP DE, DOP jDE (i.e., equivalent to single agent MAS-jDE) and the following stateof-the-art algorithms: jDE* [2], CDDE Ar [5], MLSDO [6] and mSQDE-i [9]. Algorithms DOP DE and DOP jDE are original DE [11] and jDE [1] algorithms that were adopted to solve DOP, by randomly reinitializing population when change in environment is detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(12)) found in the first experiment, was compared to the DOP DE, DOP jDE (i.e., equivalent to single agent MAS-jDE) and the following stateof-the-art algorithms: jDE* [2], CDDE Ar [5], MLSDO [6] and mSQDE-i [9]. Algorithms DOP DE and DOP jDE are original DE [11] and jDE [1] algorithms that were adopted to solve DOP, by randomly reinitializing population when change in environment is detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lepagnot et al [6] presented MLSDO algorithm, which is based on several coordinated local searches and on the archiving of the found local optima, in order to track them after a change in the objective function. Novoa et al [9] proposed an algorithm mSQDEi, a multi-population algorithm with self-adaptive strategy for controlling the population diversity and an interaction mechanism between individuals. This paper proposes multi-agent system based on self-ada-ptive differential evolution (MAS-jDE) for solving DOP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently [21] pointed out that another alternative is to implement self-adaptive strategies [20] to cope with changes. This latter approach provides the algorithm, the ability to intelligently react to environment variations, as was shown by [22,24].…”
Section: Dynamic Optimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, in the context of dynamic environments, using multi-population and self-adaptive approaches have shown to be very effective [9,22,24], specially, when combined with the differential evolution metaheuristic [28]. While the use of several populations enables a proper exploration of the search space, self-adaptation contributes to enhance the algorithm diversity and the optimum tracking over time.…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a dexterous method called "ensemble learning" is used for further enhancing the solution diversity to reach global optimum point within a reasonable computational time. This strategy was previously applied on the variants of Particle Swarm Optimization [29,30] and Differential Evolution [31,32] algorithms. With the application of ensemble learning strategy, Global Best algorithm aims to benefit variety of mutation schemes and control parameters of the Differential evolution method as well as maintaining a favorable balance between global and local search mechanisms.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Global Best Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%