2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2009.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembled InAs quantum dots on cross-hatch InGaAs templates: Excess growth, growth rate, capping and preferential alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because pyramid chains delineate line dislocations, the observed droplet motion must be, at least partially, guided by the buried dislocations by virtue of surface strain fields. The effects that subsurface dislocations have on surface adatoms are known to exist in epitaxy: dislocation networks have been used to guide the nucleation of quantum dots. Our results demonstrate the equivalent effects on evaporating surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Because pyramid chains delineate line dislocations, the observed droplet motion must be, at least partially, guided by the buried dislocations by virtue of surface strain fields. The effects that subsurface dislocations have on surface adatoms are known to exist in epitaxy: dislocation networks have been used to guide the nucleation of quantum dots. Our results demonstrate the equivalent effects on evaporating surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[13][14][15] These effects have been tentatively explained as due to the reduced mismatch between QDs and InGaAs layers, to the undulated InGaAs surface known as the Cross-Hatch Pattern (CHP) and to the presence of extended defects in the InGaAs relaxed buffers. [13][14][15][16] Hence, it seems important to gain more fundamental knowledge on the peculiarities of the growth of InAs QDs on InGaAs relaxed layers, in order to comprehend in depth the role of different characteristics of MBs on QD properties and envision more advanced designs of metamorphic InAs/InGaAs QD nanostructures. Moreover, as we show further in this article, the InAs/In x Ga 1Àx As system could be considered as a useful system for experimental testing of theoretical models of the selfassembly physical process, as it allows to independently and separately control the QD-MB mismatch f and the MB composition x.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QDs on InGaAs CHPs leads to spontaneous alignment of QDs along the cross-hatches. Main parameters used to control/optimize QDs alignment are growth interruption which affects the orderliness of QDs on the hatches [16], crosshatch layer thickness, and composition which affect MD line density [17], growth rates, excess growth, and the use of spacer layer prior to QD growth [18]. The origin and evolution of InAs QD alignment on InGaAs CHPs, which apply to other material systems, are now well understood [19,20].…”
Section: Quantum Dots On Cross-hatch Patterns Growth Of Inasmentioning
confidence: 99%