2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembled ionic liquid synthesis of nitrogen-doped mesoporous TiO2 for visible-light-responsive hydrogen production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where X is the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor, which is the geometric mean of the electronegativity of the constituent atoms, E e is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (4.5 eV), and Eg is the band gap of the semiconductor that can be obtained from Fig. S2, and the valence band edge (EVB) can be determined by EVB = ECB + Eg [60,61]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Possible Photocatalytic Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X is the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor, which is the geometric mean of the electronegativity of the constituent atoms, E e is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (4.5 eV), and Eg is the band gap of the semiconductor that can be obtained from Fig. S2, and the valence band edge (EVB) can be determined by EVB = ECB + Eg [60,61]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Possible Photocatalytic Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy is ascribed to the following reasons: photo-reactor design, inert gas (Ar or N 2 ) purging flow rate, light irradiation source, gas sampling method, gas chromatography (GC) analysis conditions, calculations, etc. .00 [421] The photochemical reactions of sacrificial agents (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, ethylene glycol, glycerol, glucose, lactic acid, triethanolamine, sodium sulfide, sodium sulfite, and sodium sulfide/sodium sulfite mixture) and their degradation products during H 2 production are summarized as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the Raman spectra of the pristine, C‐doped, and N‐doped rutile TiO 2 ceramic 3D‐TPC samples, respectively. It demonstrated that they had the same characteristic peaks of rutile TiO 2 phase at 143 cm −1 (B 1g ), 238 cm −1 (B 1g ), 446 cm −1 (E g ), and 610 cm −1 (A 1g ), which suggested that either C or N dopant did not form other phases during the doping process. This observation was consistent with the XRD analysis results, and may indicate that C or N dopant did enter the rutile TiO 2 lattice because XPS analysis results demonstrated the existence of C or N species other than surface‐adsorbed ones in doped samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%