2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembled monolayers with different terminating groups as model substrates for cell adhesion studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

75
587
4
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 685 publications
(670 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
75
587
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies reported that very hydrophilic substrates (θ < 35°) inhibit the adsorption of serum proteins, causing lower spreading and attachment of human fibroblasts in contrast to the surfaces with moderately wettable surfaces (i.e., θ = 48°-62°). [29] Similar to our findings, multiple studies report weak cell attachment on TNT. These observations are also in line with the cell behavior observed on other ordered regular nanofeatures such as nanoposts [61] and nanopits.…”
Section: Cell Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies reported that very hydrophilic substrates (θ < 35°) inhibit the adsorption of serum proteins, causing lower spreading and attachment of human fibroblasts in contrast to the surfaces with moderately wettable surfaces (i.e., θ = 48°-62°). [29] Similar to our findings, multiple studies report weak cell attachment on TNT. These observations are also in line with the cell behavior observed on other ordered regular nanofeatures such as nanoposts [61] and nanopits.…”
Section: Cell Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the majority of chemical methods modify not only topography, but also other surface features such as chemical composition, [25] wettability, [26] crystallinity, [27] and adsorption ability. [28] These surface observables can also modulate cell behavior [27,[29][30][31] (for more information about surface modification strategies and cellular recognition of these surfaces see the review papers [32,33] ) and it is difficult to distinguish which factor leads to the observed cell response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[52,53] To study whether the initial amount of adsorbed fibronectin on PLLA/ZnO was due to differences in the initial superficial charges of the surfaces, we measured the Z-potential. However, similar values were obtained for both surfaces, -30.20 ± 0.75 mV -PLLA and -33.07 ± 3.65mV -PLLA/ZnO, which disregards the possible effect of surface charge on the higher protein adsorption measured on the nanocomposite.…”
Section: Figure 4amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The presence of acid functional groups on a surface is known to promote cell attachment. [37][38][39] If the cells are adhered too well, they are less likely to get transferred to the wound bed. 28 Therefore, we investigated the transfer efficiency of surfaces with various concentrations of acid functionalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%