2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-012-0333-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembling of non-Brownian magnetized spheres

Abstract: International audienceIf we pour spherical beads in a container and then gently shake it to increase the compaction of the system, the packing fraction will converge logarithmically to 0.64, the density of a random close packing. If the system is specially sheared, or tapped through an annealing procedure, lattices may self-organize. In this work we study granular crystallization induced by magnetic cohesion. We observe an interesting granular polymorphism probably due to an effective van der Waals-like intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lumay and Vandewalle [16] explored the properties of a granular packing submitted to a vertical magnetic field: the beads are organized such that low packing fractions can be reached. In another experiment, Carvente et al [17] obtained denser self-assembled systems using magnetized spheres. In the dilute limit, Falcon et al [18] experimented random magnetic forcing of a granular gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lumay and Vandewalle [16] explored the properties of a granular packing submitted to a vertical magnetic field: the beads are organized such that low packing fractions can be reached. In another experiment, Carvente et al [17] obtained denser self-assembled systems using magnetized spheres. In the dilute limit, Falcon et al [18] experimented random magnetic forcing of a granular gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although inter-particle collisions will lead to overall energy dissipation throughout a system of particles, as long as the total energy input to the system is greater than the rate of dissipation, the necessary freedom for erratic and exploratory particle motion is achieved. 20,37,38 Exploring this balance between fluctuational energy (either natural or externally applied) and dissipation has allowed Klotsa and Jack to model the equilibrium dynamics of colloidal systems. 39 Their work describes kinetically trapped states at different time stages throughout the crystallization process and supports the suggestion of Whitesides and Boncheva, describing that particles must be able to adjust their positioning in order to effectively assemble into a periodically ordered structure.…”
Section: Fabrication Methods For Creating Crystals From Spherical Non...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of liquid bridges between the particles alters the interparticle interactions due to the introduction of capillary forces and helps induce different crystalline orientations. 27,37 Similarly to the open systems we have primarily discussed, adjusting the container properties appropriately also provides design control over the resulting crystal orientation when creating crystals in a closed system (where the particles are added to the container prior to vibrational annealing). 27,63 Low ratios of the container diameter to particle diameter have been shown to induce crystallization and increase the overall packing fraction.…”
Section: Packing Density As a Function Of The Crystal Fabrication Met...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The emerging crystalline structures were found to minimize the gravitational potential energy and the kinetic energy from agitation for rectangular container geometries. 10,13,17 These findings suggest that crystallization of granular spheres into densest packings by gravity forms a deep energy minimum, that is hard to leave by interactions emerging from opposite charging. Emergence of order by triboelectric charging may consequently be best observed in a container that does not allow for crystallization by gravity, as the order process does not have to compete the formation of a densest packing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%