2003
DOI: 10.1021/ja028861q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Assembly Mechanism of a Bimetallic Europium Triple-Stranded Helicate

Abstract: We report the self-assembly process of a supramolecular edifice based on the coordination of europium(III) by a ditopic strand L bearing tridentate bis(benzimidazolyl)pyridine subunits. Varying the metal/ligand ratio and using a fruitful combination of electrospray mass spectrometry and absorption spectrophotometry, we characterized three major complexes (EuL(2), Eu(2)L(2), and Eu(2)L(3)) in acetonitrile. Kinetic investigations showed an alternative "braiding" and "keystone" mechanism leading to Eu(2)L(3). The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the formation mechanism of Eu 2 (L A ) 3 for which we propose the formation of a labile intermediate Eu 2 (L A ) 2 . [30] As far as we can tell, the increased inertness of the key intermediate is the main reason why the rate constant of the last step in the self-assembly process of Eu 2 L 3 is 10 5 times larger than Eu 2 (L A ) 3 . Moreover, the addition of the successive ligand strands leads to a strong diminishing of the electrostatic interactions between the two coordination sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast to the formation mechanism of Eu 2 (L A ) 3 for which we propose the formation of a labile intermediate Eu 2 (L A ) 2 . [30] As far as we can tell, the increased inertness of the key intermediate is the main reason why the rate constant of the last step in the self-assembly process of Eu 2 L 3 is 10 5 times larger than Eu 2 (L A ) 3 . Moreover, the addition of the successive ligand strands leads to a strong diminishing of the electrostatic interactions between the two coordination sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kinetic behavior points to the Eu 2 L 2 intermediate probably adopting a structure different from the ''side-by-side'' arrangement observed for Eu 2 (L B ) 2 in the solid state. [22] Indeed the formation of a 2:2 helical structure at this stage will decrease the steric hindrance and, moreover, the presence of negatively charged terminal carboxylate groups obviously contributes to prevent the formation a labile ''side-by-side'' [30,57] species. This is in contrast to the formation mechanism of Eu 2 (L A ) 3 for which we propose the formation of a labile intermediate Eu 2 (L A ) 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since b 13 is not accessible, the cooperativity process refers to the fixation of the third lanthanide ion with respect to the average binding of the metal ions in [Ln 2 (L7) 3 ] 6 , and we conclude that electrostatic repulsion associated with the complexation of the third Ln III is more than compensated by the preorganization of the receptor brought about by the first two metal ions. Related Scatchard plots for the bimetallic helicates [Ln 2 (L1) 3 ] 6 (Ln La, Eu, Lu) display convex curves and negative cooperativity; [29] this highlights the crucial role played by 1) the ligand design (i.e., the replacement of terminal benzimidazole groups in L1 or L6 [20] with carboxamide groups in L7) and 2) the overall nuclearity of the assembly processes. (Figure 4a, detailed assignments and discussion are given in the section dedicated to the solution structure of [Ln 3 (L7) 3 ] 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%