2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.progsurf.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembly of metal–organic coordination structures on surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
261
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
2
261
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To unveil the stabilizing intermolecular bonds in these hexamers, acquiring complementary information on the chemical state of HATP is indispensable. In this respect, it is important to address the question of a possible deprotonation of the amino groups and formation of metal‐coordination bonds after room‐temperature deposition onto Cu(111) . Therefore, XP spectra were acquired from N 1s and C 1s core levels, whereby the spectra of three‐ to four‐layer‐thick films shown in Figures a, b served as references for chemically unaltered HATP molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…To unveil the stabilizing intermolecular bonds in these hexamers, acquiring complementary information on the chemical state of HATP is indispensable. In this respect, it is important to address the question of a possible deprotonation of the amino groups and formation of metal‐coordination bonds after room‐temperature deposition onto Cu(111) . Therefore, XP spectra were acquired from N 1s and C 1s core levels, whereby the spectra of three‐ to four‐layer‐thick films shown in Figures a, b served as references for chemically unaltered HATP molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…One way to circumvent this issue is by fixing molecular catalysts on a conducting solid support. Interestingly, transition metal porphyrins and similar molecular complexes are known to self‐assemble on coinage metal supports . Several studies have been devoted towards understanding the molecule‐support interaction of transition metal–porphyrins or pthalocyanines on supports such as gold, silver, copper, platinum or even non‐metal surfaces such as graphene,, graphene oxide,, and carbon nanotubes ,,.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In particular, by confining the selfassembly process on solid substrates, two-dimensional (2D) structures can be formed 11,12 by exploiting a number of different intermolecular forces: from metal coordination 13,14 to hydrogen bonding 14,15 , to weaker dispersion interactions. 16 While the nature of the interactions between the molecular units is typically the key factor in determining the resulting assembly, other more subtle influences have also been reported to affect the final supramolecular structures: the chemistry and symmetry of the substrate (even for inert surfaces such as highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) and Au(111) 17 ), the temperature, [18][19][20] the ultra-high vacuum (UHV) or solution environment, 19,21,22 the nature of the solvent, 19,[23][24][25][26][27][28] the concentration of the solute (the self-assembling molecule), 18,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and any co-adsorption of solvent or guest molecules 24,25,34,36,37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%